Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage Predicts Extended Length of Stay And Non-Home Discharge but Not Readmissions or Reoperations After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Ignacio Pasqualini, Alp Turan, Shujaa T Khan, Ahmed K Emara, Mustafa M Mahmood, Omolola Fakunle, Theodore Rudic, Tariq Said, Mitchell K Ng, Assem A Sultan, Jason Savage, Dominic W Pelle
{"title":"Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage Predicts Extended Length of Stay And Non-Home Discharge but Not Readmissions or Reoperations After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.","authors":"Ignacio Pasqualini, Alp Turan, Shujaa T Khan, Ahmed K Emara, Mustafa M Mahmood, Omolola Fakunle, Theodore Rudic, Tariq Said, Mitchell K Ng, Assem A Sultan, Jason Savage, Dominic W Pelle","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Socioeconomic disadvantage has been associated with worse outcomes across various surgical disciplines. However, the impact of neighborhood-level disadvantage on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains poorly studied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, as measured by Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with patient demographics, lengths of stay, discharge dispositions, and 90-day reoperation and readmission rates following ACDF.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing primary ACDF at a tertiary academic medical center from October 2018 to October 2020.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>395 patients with primary ACDF were included. Patients were assigned ADI scores based on home zip codes and categorized into quartiles: low (≤25), mild (26-50), moderate (51-75), and severe (76-100) disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Length of stay >3 days, non-home discharge, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day reoperations. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details were also collected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Univariate and multivariate analyses compared outcomes across ADI quartiles. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the impact of ADI on outcomes while controlling for other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the low deprivation group, patients with severe deprivation were younger, more likely to be black, unmarried, uninsured, and current smokers (all p<0.001). Higher ADI quartile independently predicted extended length of stay (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.34-3.41, p<0.001) and non-home discharge (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.17-3.01, p=0.011). No significant differences were found in 90-day readmissions or reoperations based on ADI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with prolonged hospitalization and lower likelihood of home discharge after ACDF. These findings highlight the importance of considering social determinants of health in risk stratification and care optimization for patients undergoing spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background context: Socioeconomic disadvantage has been associated with worse outcomes across various surgical disciplines. However, the impact of neighborhood-level disadvantage on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains poorly studied.
Purpose: To evaluate the association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, as measured by Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with patient demographics, lengths of stay, discharge dispositions, and 90-day reoperation and readmission rates following ACDF.
Study design/setting: Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing primary ACDF at a tertiary academic medical center from October 2018 to October 2020.
Patient sample: 395 patients with primary ACDF were included. Patients were assigned ADI scores based on home zip codes and categorized into quartiles: low (≤25), mild (26-50), moderate (51-75), and severe (76-100) disadvantage.
Outcome measures: Length of stay >3 days, non-home discharge, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day reoperations. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details were also collected.
Methods: Univariate and multivariate analyses compared outcomes across ADI quartiles. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the impact of ADI on outcomes while controlling for other factors.
Results: Compared to the low deprivation group, patients with severe deprivation were younger, more likely to be black, unmarried, uninsured, and current smokers (all p<0.001). Higher ADI quartile independently predicted extended length of stay (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.34-3.41, p<0.001) and non-home discharge (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.17-3.01, p=0.011). No significant differences were found in 90-day readmissions or reoperations based on ADI.
Conclusions: Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with prolonged hospitalization and lower likelihood of home discharge after ACDF. These findings highlight the importance of considering social determinants of health in risk stratification and care optimization for patients undergoing spine surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.