Association Between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Use and Surgical Outcomes Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Medical Claims Database Analysis.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Aneysis D Gonzalez-Suarez, Allen Green, María José Cavagnaro, Emily Moya, Corinna Zygourakis, Atman M Desai
{"title":"Association Between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Use and Surgical Outcomes Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Medical Claims Database Analysis.","authors":"Aneysis D Gonzalez-Suarez, Allen Green, María José Cavagnaro, Emily Moya, Corinna Zygourakis, Atman M Desai","doi":"10.14444/8732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed for postoperative pain management after spinal fusion surgeries, but their potential impact on fusion outcomes and wound healing remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To use a national database and consistent selection criteria to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients who first received NSAIDs ≤ 72 hours, 72 hours to 90 days, and 90 days to 1 year after posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery, to those who never received NSAIDs within the first year of surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Merative Marketscan Research Databases, we analyzed PLF patients aged 18 to 90 years who underwent either single- and multilevel fusions. A subanalysis focused specifically on single-level fusions. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for confounders, we compared the outcomes of patients first administered NSAIDs at 3 different postoperative timeframes (≤72 hours, 72 hours to 90 days, and 90 days to 1 year) to patients who did not receive NSAIDs within 1 year of surgery. The outcomes evaluated included 30-day readmissions, length of stay, pseudoarthrosis, hardware failure, and wound complications up to 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single- and multilevel PLF patients who received >90-day courses of NSAIDs 72 hours to 1 year postoperatively had greater odds of pseudoarthrosis, with those receiving short, ≤30-day courses of NSAIDs 72 hours to 90 days postoperatively additionally having greater odds of wound complications. Meanwhile, patients who started≤30-day courses of NSAIDs within 72 hours of surgery experienced reduced length of stay and lower rates of wound complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administration of long courses of NSAIDs >72 hours to 1 year after PLF surgery is associated with higher odds of pseudoarthrosis, while short courses of NSAIDs administered 72 hours to 90 days of surgery are additionally associated with higher odds of wound complications. Conversely, patients who received NSAIDs within 72hours of surgery may experience a slightly reduced length of hospital stay, with short courses of NSAIDs protecting against wound complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study suggests that the timing and duration of postoperative NSAID use after posterior lumbar fusion can significantly affect outcomes, particularly fusion integrity and wound healing. These findings may help guide pain management protocols to balance effective analgesia with minimizing surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"224-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed for postoperative pain management after spinal fusion surgeries, but their potential impact on fusion outcomes and wound healing remains controversial.

Objective: To use a national database and consistent selection criteria to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients who first received NSAIDs ≤ 72 hours, 72 hours to 90 days, and 90 days to 1 year after posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery, to those who never received NSAIDs within the first year of surgery.

Methods: Using the Merative Marketscan Research Databases, we analyzed PLF patients aged 18 to 90 years who underwent either single- and multilevel fusions. A subanalysis focused specifically on single-level fusions. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for confounders, we compared the outcomes of patients first administered NSAIDs at 3 different postoperative timeframes (≤72 hours, 72 hours to 90 days, and 90 days to 1 year) to patients who did not receive NSAIDs within 1 year of surgery. The outcomes evaluated included 30-day readmissions, length of stay, pseudoarthrosis, hardware failure, and wound complications up to 1 year after surgery.

Results: Single- and multilevel PLF patients who received >90-day courses of NSAIDs 72 hours to 1 year postoperatively had greater odds of pseudoarthrosis, with those receiving short, ≤30-day courses of NSAIDs 72 hours to 90 days postoperatively additionally having greater odds of wound complications. Meanwhile, patients who started≤30-day courses of NSAIDs within 72 hours of surgery experienced reduced length of stay and lower rates of wound complications.

Conclusion: Administration of long courses of NSAIDs >72 hours to 1 year after PLF surgery is associated with higher odds of pseudoarthrosis, while short courses of NSAIDs administered 72 hours to 90 days of surgery are additionally associated with higher odds of wound complications. Conversely, patients who received NSAIDs within 72hours of surgery may experience a slightly reduced length of hospital stay, with short courses of NSAIDs protecting against wound complications.

Clinical relevance: This study suggests that the timing and duration of postoperative NSAID use after posterior lumbar fusion can significantly affect outcomes, particularly fusion integrity and wound healing. These findings may help guide pain management protocols to balance effective analgesia with minimizing surgical complications.

Level of evidence: 3:

非甾体抗炎药的使用与后路腰椎融合术后手术结果的关系:一项医疗索赔数据库分析。
背景:非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)通常用于脊柱融合术后疼痛管理,但其对融合结果和伤口愈合的潜在影响仍存在争议。目的:利用国家数据库和一致的选择标准,比较后路腰椎融合术(PLF)术后≤72小时、72小时至90天、90天至1年首次接受非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者与术后一年内未接受非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者的术后结果。方法:使用Merative Marketscan研究数据库,我们分析了18至90岁接受单节段和多节段融合的PLF患者。一个子分析专门针对单级融合。使用治疗加权逆概率来调整混杂因素,我们比较了在术后3个不同时间段(≤72小时、72小时至90天、90天至1年)首次使用非甾体抗炎药的患者与在手术1年内未使用非甾体抗炎药的患者的结果。评估的结果包括30天再入院、住院时间、假关节、硬件故障和手术后1年的伤口并发症。结果:单节段和多节段PLF患者术后72小时至1年接受90天非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者发生假关节的几率更大,而那些术后72小时至90天接受短时间≤30天非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者发生伤口并发症的几率更大。同时,在手术72小时内开始≤30天疗程的非甾体抗炎药患者住院时间缩短,伤口并发症发生率降低。结论:PLF术后72小时至1年使用较长疗程的非甾体抗炎药与较高的假关节发生率相关,而术后72小时至90天使用较短疗程的非甾体抗炎药与较高的伤口并发症发生率相关。相反,在手术72小时内接受非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者可能会稍微缩短住院时间,因为短疗程的非甾体抗炎药可以防止伤口并发症。临床相关性:该研究表明,后路腰椎融合术后使用非甾体抗炎药的时机和持续时间可显著影响结果,特别是融合完整性和伤口愈合。这些发现可能有助于指导疼痛管理方案,以平衡有效的镇痛和尽量减少手术并发症。证据等级:3;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信