Psychological, personal, and professional development needs of military mental health clinicians: Identifying implications for wellbeing and best practice utilizing the Delphi method.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dorota O'Brien, John Bogue
{"title":"Psychological, personal, and professional development needs of military mental health clinicians: Identifying implications for wellbeing and best practice utilizing the Delphi method.","authors":"Dorota O'Brien, John Bogue","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2025.2481342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improving pathways of care should be based on a recognition of the distinct and specific groups of professionals within the military environment. This study looked to explore the types of development needs of military mental health providers, examine the implications of unmet needs, discover mitigating factors, and evaluate barriers and challenges experienced by uniformed healthcare staff. This research project used a mixed-method approach utilizing the Delphi Method to find consensus and measure importance. A group of 23 senior international military mental health experts (<i>N</i> = 23) took part in the study. Findings revealed that <i>growth, respect, sense of belonging, satisfaction, competence, expertise, good communication, time for self-care, physical training, rest</i>, and <i>nutrition</i>, were the most important needs. Main ways to mitigate the aversive effects of unmet needs were <i>effective lines of communication</i> and <i>consideration of needs</i>. The study found that neglecting the needs of clinicians caused wide-ranging implications, mainly <i>burnout</i> and <i>stress</i>, but also <i>poor work motivation, poor treatment outcome, decreased morale</i>, and <i>lack of trust and belief in the organization</i>. The Delphi methodology revealed that within the organizational domain, <i>leaders' general support, having a team</i>, and <i>good relationships</i> were crucial, while <i>resilience, independence, sense of purpose</i>, and <i>sense of meaning</i> were the key factors in the professional attribute category. Subject matter experts (SMEs) agreed that <i>overwhelming demands</i> posed the biggest challenge for this group of professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2481342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving pathways of care should be based on a recognition of the distinct and specific groups of professionals within the military environment. This study looked to explore the types of development needs of military mental health providers, examine the implications of unmet needs, discover mitigating factors, and evaluate barriers and challenges experienced by uniformed healthcare staff. This research project used a mixed-method approach utilizing the Delphi Method to find consensus and measure importance. A group of 23 senior international military mental health experts (N = 23) took part in the study. Findings revealed that growth, respect, sense of belonging, satisfaction, competence, expertise, good communication, time for self-care, physical training, rest, and nutrition, were the most important needs. Main ways to mitigate the aversive effects of unmet needs were effective lines of communication and consideration of needs. The study found that neglecting the needs of clinicians caused wide-ranging implications, mainly burnout and stress, but also poor work motivation, poor treatment outcome, decreased morale, and lack of trust and belief in the organization. The Delphi methodology revealed that within the organizational domain, leaders' general support, having a team, and good relationships were crucial, while resilience, independence, sense of purpose, and sense of meaning were the key factors in the professional attribute category. Subject matter experts (SMEs) agreed that overwhelming demands posed the biggest challenge for this group of professionals.

军事心理健康临床医生的心理、个人和专业发展需求:利用德尔菲法确定对健康和最佳实践的影响。
改善护理途径应基于对军事环境中独特和特定的专业人员群体的认识。本研究旨在探讨军人心理卫生服务提供者的发展需求类型,检查未满足需求的含义,发现缓解因素,并评估制服卫生保健人员遇到的障碍和挑战。本研究项目采用混合方法,利用德尔菲法来寻找共识和衡量重要性。23名国际高级军事心理健康专家(N = 23)参加了这项研究。调查结果显示,成长、尊重、归属感、满意度、能力、专业知识、良好的沟通、自我照顾的时间、体育锻炼、休息和营养是最重要的需求。减轻未满足需求的不良影响的主要方法是有效的沟通渠道和对需求的考虑。研究发现,忽视临床医生的需求会造成广泛的影响,主要是倦怠和压力,但也会导致工作动机低下、治疗结果不佳、士气下降以及对组织缺乏信任和信念。德尔菲法发现,在组织领域内,领导者的普遍支持、拥有团队和良好的关系是关键因素,而弹性、独立性、目的感和意义感是专业属性类别的关键因素。主题专家(sme)一致认为,压倒性的需求对这群专业人士构成了最大的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Psychology
Military Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信