Patterns of Transient and Terminal Transitions in Activities of Daily Living Performance Levels among Long-Term Care Residents: A Multistate Markov’s Model Analysis of Population-Based Longitudinal Data in Canada

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Bonaventure A. Egbujie MD, MPH, PhD , Luke A. Turcotte PhD , Reem T. Mulla MBBS, MCM, MHM, PhD , George A. Heckman MD, MSc , John P. Hirdes PhD, FCAHS
{"title":"Patterns of Transient and Terminal Transitions in Activities of Daily Living Performance Levels among Long-Term Care Residents: A Multistate Markov’s Model Analysis of Population-Based Longitudinal Data in Canada","authors":"Bonaventure A. Egbujie MD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Luke A. Turcotte PhD ,&nbsp;Reem T. Mulla MBBS, MCM, MHM, PhD ,&nbsp;George A. Heckman MD, MSc ,&nbsp;John P. Hirdes PhD, FCAHS","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We examined how long-term care (LTC) home residents transition between different activities of daily living (ADL) performance levels, and to eventual terminal clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted a longitudinal retrospective analysis of population-based data among institutionalized older adults within 3 Canadian provinces.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>LTC home residents within 3 Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario placed between January 2010 and December 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We fit a Markov-chain multistate transition model to the data to obtain transition probabilities, sojourn times, as well as the adjusted odds of each transition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three distinct transitions were commonly experienced by residents from this analysis. Most LTC residents stayed unchanged in their ADL performance level between 90-day assessments, a substantial proportion transitioned to worse performance level, and only a small proportion improved to a better performance level. Residents spent on average between 21 and 29 months on admission before finally transitioning out of the setting to 1 of 4 terminal states that include mortality, hospitalization, home, or other setting discharges. Within 5 years of admission, between 63% and 72% died, 18% to 19% were hospitalized, and 2% to 4% were discharged back home. The odds of transitioning to different states were strongly affected by factors such as Index of Social Engagement, Cognitive Performance Scale, Changes in Health, End Stage Disease, and Signs and Symptoms score, age, as well as province where the LTC home is located, but varied depending on the admission ADL status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Evidence from this study shows that it does not always have to be <em>one way</em> out for LTC residents. LTC home administrators could use the findings to identify residents who could be provided the right intervention to facilitate ADL performance improvement and prevent further decline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 6","pages":"Article 105565"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We examined how long-term care (LTC) home residents transition between different activities of daily living (ADL) performance levels, and to eventual terminal clinical outcomes.

Design

We conducted a longitudinal retrospective analysis of population-based data among institutionalized older adults within 3 Canadian provinces.

Setting and Participants

LTC home residents within 3 Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario placed between January 2010 and December 2020.

Methods

We fit a Markov-chain multistate transition model to the data to obtain transition probabilities, sojourn times, as well as the adjusted odds of each transition.

Results

Three distinct transitions were commonly experienced by residents from this analysis. Most LTC residents stayed unchanged in their ADL performance level between 90-day assessments, a substantial proportion transitioned to worse performance level, and only a small proportion improved to a better performance level. Residents spent on average between 21 and 29 months on admission before finally transitioning out of the setting to 1 of 4 terminal states that include mortality, hospitalization, home, or other setting discharges. Within 5 years of admission, between 63% and 72% died, 18% to 19% were hospitalized, and 2% to 4% were discharged back home. The odds of transitioning to different states were strongly affected by factors such as Index of Social Engagement, Cognitive Performance Scale, Changes in Health, End Stage Disease, and Signs and Symptoms score, age, as well as province where the LTC home is located, but varied depending on the admission ADL status.

Conclusions and Implications

Evidence from this study shows that it does not always have to be one way out for LTC residents. LTC home administrators could use the findings to identify residents who could be provided the right intervention to facilitate ADL performance improvement and prevent further decline.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信