Limited utility of price transparency data for drugs.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yuvraj Pathak, Elvira Makk Frid, Nico Gabriel, Shangbin Tang, Inmaculada Hernandez
{"title":"Limited utility of price transparency data for drugs.","authors":"Yuvraj Pathak, Elvira Makk Frid, Nico Gabriel, Shangbin Tang, Inmaculada Hernandez","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2021, hospitals have been required to report the prices of common, shoppable services, including drugs, as per the Hospital Price Transparency Rule. In this paper, we used Hospital Price Transparency data aggregated by Turquoise Health to investigate the usability of price transparency data to evaluate variation in reimbursement for provider-administered drugs. We extracted records for 30 procedure codes corresponding to provider-administered drugs reported by at least 1,000 National Provider Identifiers (NPIs) and evaluated variability in rates reported for each procedure code. Among 3,321,502 records extracted, 65% had missing NPI, reimbursement rate, or National Drug Code (NDC) information. The remaining 35% of entries reporting NDC information did not necessarily report negotiated rates in the quantity of the NDC. Instead, they contained a combination of prices expressed in at least 3 different quantities: the quantity in which the procedure code is expressed, the unit of the NDC, and the total quantity of drugs administered to the patient. Until providers follow standardized requirements for the reporting of the data, the Hospital Price Transparency data should be used with caution, as the inability to correctly identify the unit in which prices are expressed can lead to incorrect inferences about drug prices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 4","pages":"338-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2021, hospitals have been required to report the prices of common, shoppable services, including drugs, as per the Hospital Price Transparency Rule. In this paper, we used Hospital Price Transparency data aggregated by Turquoise Health to investigate the usability of price transparency data to evaluate variation in reimbursement for provider-administered drugs. We extracted records for 30 procedure codes corresponding to provider-administered drugs reported by at least 1,000 National Provider Identifiers (NPIs) and evaluated variability in rates reported for each procedure code. Among 3,321,502 records extracted, 65% had missing NPI, reimbursement rate, or National Drug Code (NDC) information. The remaining 35% of entries reporting NDC information did not necessarily report negotiated rates in the quantity of the NDC. Instead, they contained a combination of prices expressed in at least 3 different quantities: the quantity in which the procedure code is expressed, the unit of the NDC, and the total quantity of drugs administered to the patient. Until providers follow standardized requirements for the reporting of the data, the Hospital Price Transparency data should be used with caution, as the inability to correctly identify the unit in which prices are expressed can lead to incorrect inferences about drug prices.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信