Modifying quantitative sensory testing to investigate tactile sensory function and behavioral reactivity in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: establishing feasibility and testing sex, autism, and self-injury effects.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jaclyn Gunderson, Emma Worthley, Breanne Byiers, Alyssa Merbler, Andrea Huebner, Deanna Hofschulte, Jasmine Lee, Catherine Riodique, Frank Symons
{"title":"Modifying quantitative sensory testing to investigate tactile sensory function and behavioral reactivity in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: establishing feasibility and testing sex, autism, and self-injury effects.","authors":"Jaclyn Gunderson, Emma Worthley, Breanne Byiers, Alyssa Merbler, Andrea Huebner, Deanna Hofschulte, Jasmine Lee, Catherine Riodique, Frank Symons","doi":"10.1186/s11689-025-09603-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensory reactivity differences are common across neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), however very few studies specifically examine tactile or pain responses in children with NNDs, especially those with communication challenges. The current study aimed to (a) replicate the feasibility of a modified quantitative sensory test (mQST) with a sample of children with NDDs, (b) assess validity evidence based on behavioral reactivity during mQST application and the corresponding behavioral measurement coding system, and (c) explore group differences in behavioral reactivity to mQST stimuli by demographic (sex), clinical (autism status), and behavioral pathology (self-injury) variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mQST protocol was implemented and blindly coded across 47 participants aged 2-12 years (M age = 6.7 years, SD = 2.6; 70% male) with NDDs. Feasibility was measured by completion of the mQST protocol and interobserver agreement. Validity was assessed using paired t-tests investigating differences between behavioral reactivity to active stimuli compared to a sham trial. Boxplots were used to visually explore differences in group characteristics (sex, autism status, and self-injurious behavior), with two-sample t-tests used to further characterize differences in SIB group characteristics in behavioral reactivity to mQST stimuli.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mQST provided codable data across 91% of stimuli applications with high IOA (84.7% [76.7-95%]). Behavioral reactivity was significantly higher for active vs. sham stimuli. Children reported to engage in self-injurious behavior showed significantly more reactivity to the second half of the repeated von Frey stimulus application compared to children without caregiver-reported self-injurious behavior (M = 6.14, SD = 3.44), t (40)= -2.247, p =.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mQST is a feasible approach to investigate tactile reactivity in children with NDDs and complex communication needs. The mQST may be useful in understanding sensory variables in relation to developmental and behavioral outcomes such as self-injurious behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":16530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"17 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-025-09603-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sensory reactivity differences are common across neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), however very few studies specifically examine tactile or pain responses in children with NNDs, especially those with communication challenges. The current study aimed to (a) replicate the feasibility of a modified quantitative sensory test (mQST) with a sample of children with NDDs, (b) assess validity evidence based on behavioral reactivity during mQST application and the corresponding behavioral measurement coding system, and (c) explore group differences in behavioral reactivity to mQST stimuli by demographic (sex), clinical (autism status), and behavioral pathology (self-injury) variables.

Methods: The mQST protocol was implemented and blindly coded across 47 participants aged 2-12 years (M age = 6.7 years, SD = 2.6; 70% male) with NDDs. Feasibility was measured by completion of the mQST protocol and interobserver agreement. Validity was assessed using paired t-tests investigating differences between behavioral reactivity to active stimuli compared to a sham trial. Boxplots were used to visually explore differences in group characteristics (sex, autism status, and self-injurious behavior), with two-sample t-tests used to further characterize differences in SIB group characteristics in behavioral reactivity to mQST stimuli.

Results: The mQST provided codable data across 91% of stimuli applications with high IOA (84.7% [76.7-95%]). Behavioral reactivity was significantly higher for active vs. sham stimuli. Children reported to engage in self-injurious behavior showed significantly more reactivity to the second half of the repeated von Frey stimulus application compared to children without caregiver-reported self-injurious behavior (M = 6.14, SD = 3.44), t (40)= -2.247, p =.04).

Conclusion: The mQST is a feasible approach to investigate tactile reactivity in children with NDDs and complex communication needs. The mQST may be useful in understanding sensory variables in relation to developmental and behavioral outcomes such as self-injurious behavior.

改进定量感觉测试以研究智力和发育障碍儿童的触觉感觉功能和行为反应性:建立可行性并测试性别、自闭症和自伤效应。
背景:感觉反应性差异在神经发育障碍(ndd)中很常见,但是很少有研究专门检查nnd儿童的触觉或疼痛反应,特别是那些有沟通障碍的儿童。本研究旨在(a)在ndd儿童样本中验证改进的定量感觉测试(mQST)的可行性,(b)基于mQST应用过程中的行为反应性和相应的行为测量编码系统评估效度证据,以及(c)通过人口统计学(性别)、临床(自闭症状态)和行为病理学(自伤)变量探讨mQST刺激的行为反应性的组间差异。方法:对47名2-12岁(M年龄= 6.7岁,SD = 2.6;70%男性)患有ndd。可行性通过mQST协议和观察者间协议的完成程度来衡量。使用配对t检验来评估有效性,调查与假试验相比,对主动刺激的行为反应性的差异。箱形图用于直观地探索组特征(性别、自闭症状态和自伤行为)的差异,双样本t检验用于进一步表征SIB组在mQST刺激行为反应性特征上的差异。结果:mQST在91%的高IOA刺激应用中提供了可编码的数据(84.7%[76.7-95%])。主动刺激和虚假刺激的行为反应性明显更高。有自伤行为的儿童对von Frey刺激后半部分的反应性明显高于无自伤行为的儿童(M = 6.14, SD = 3.44), t (40)= -2.247, p = 0.04)。结论:mQST是研究ndd患儿触觉反应性的一种可行方法。mQST可能有助于理解与发育和行为结果(如自残行为)相关的感觉变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders is an open access journal that integrates current, cutting-edge research across a number of disciplines, including neurobiology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal’s primary focus is on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Turner Syndrome, 22q Deletion Syndrome, Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome, Williams syndrome, lysosomal storage diseases, dyslexia, specific language impairment and fetal alcohol syndrome. With the discovery of specific genes underlying neurodevelopmental syndromes, the emergence of powerful tools for studying neural circuitry, and the development of new approaches for exploring molecular mechanisms, interdisciplinary research on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders is now increasingly common. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders provides a unique venue for researchers interested in comparing and contrasting mechanisms and characteristics related to the pathogenesis of the full range of neurodevelopmental disorders, sharpening our understanding of the etiology and relevant phenotypes of each condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信