Preservation Versus Release of Normal Long Head of Biceps Tendon in Repair of Isolated Stage-1 Supraspinatus Tears: Preservation Leads to Slightly Lower Constant-Murley Scores and More Reoperations.
Julien Berhouet, Adrien Jacquot, François Gadéa, Jacques Guery, Thierry Joudet, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Xavier Ohl, Lionel Neyton, Nicolas Gasse, Johannes Barth, Maxime Antoni, Franck Dordain, David Gallinet, Christophe Charousset
{"title":"Preservation Versus Release of Normal Long Head of Biceps Tendon in Repair of Isolated Stage-1 Supraspinatus Tears: Preservation Leads to Slightly Lower Constant-Murley Scores and More Reoperations.","authors":"Julien Berhouet, Adrien Jacquot, François Gadéa, Jacques Guery, Thierry Joudet, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Xavier Ohl, Lionel Neyton, Nicolas Gasse, Johannes Barth, Maxime Antoni, Franck Dordain, David Gallinet, Christophe Charousset","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine whether preserving a normal-appearing long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon leads to better Constant-Murley scores (CMS) than releasing it in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of an isolated stage-1 supraspinatus tendon tear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (40 to 70 years old) who were undergoing arthroscopic repair of a minor supraspinatus tendon tear and who had a macroscopically normal LHB were randomized to LHB preservation or LHB release during a prospective clinical trial. The surgeon was free to choose whether to perform tenodesis in patients undergoing LHB release. The primary outcome was the involved shoulder's function based on the absolute CMS score at 6 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). A post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data was done using 1:1 propensity score matching without replacement. This resulted in 2 age- and sex-matched groups of 95 patients each. Race and ethnicity data were not collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 24 months, the mean CMS was significantly better in the LHB release group (mean and standard deviation, 86.8 ± 8.3) than in the LHB preservation group (82.9 ± 10.0) (p = 0.003), 97% of the patients in the LHB release group and 88% in the LHB preservation group had more than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the CMS in rotator cuff repair (p = 0.048), 15% in the LHB preservation group and 3% in the LHB release group (p = 0.01) had an absolute CMS below 70, and the ASES was significantly higher in the LHB release group (91.4 ± 19.2) than in the LHB preservation group (83.6 ± 25.0) (p = 0.02). There were 4 reoperations in the LHB preservation group and no reoperations in the LHB release group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our findings, a macroscopically normal-appearing biceps tendon should be released when treating stage-1 supraspinatus tendon tears.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00423","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether preserving a normal-appearing long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon leads to better Constant-Murley scores (CMS) than releasing it in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of an isolated stage-1 supraspinatus tendon tear.
Methods: Patients (40 to 70 years old) who were undergoing arthroscopic repair of a minor supraspinatus tendon tear and who had a macroscopically normal LHB were randomized to LHB preservation or LHB release during a prospective clinical trial. The surgeon was free to choose whether to perform tenodesis in patients undergoing LHB release. The primary outcome was the involved shoulder's function based on the absolute CMS score at 6 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). A post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data was done using 1:1 propensity score matching without replacement. This resulted in 2 age- and sex-matched groups of 95 patients each. Race and ethnicity data were not collected.
Results: At 24 months, the mean CMS was significantly better in the LHB release group (mean and standard deviation, 86.8 ± 8.3) than in the LHB preservation group (82.9 ± 10.0) (p = 0.003), 97% of the patients in the LHB release group and 88% in the LHB preservation group had more than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the CMS in rotator cuff repair (p = 0.048), 15% in the LHB preservation group and 3% in the LHB release group (p = 0.01) had an absolute CMS below 70, and the ASES was significantly higher in the LHB release group (91.4 ± 19.2) than in the LHB preservation group (83.6 ± 25.0) (p = 0.02). There were 4 reoperations in the LHB preservation group and no reoperations in the LHB release group.
Conclusions: Based on our findings, a macroscopically normal-appearing biceps tendon should be released when treating stage-1 supraspinatus tendon tears.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
