{"title":"Exploring Patient Awareness and the Feasibility of Mediation in Healthcare: A Pilot Study in Bulgaria.","authors":"Kostadin Yordanov Dimitrov, Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13060629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The healthcare system is complex and emotionally charged, which frequently leads to conflicts between patients and healthcare providers as a result of inadequate communication and unmet patient expectations. This pilot study investigates patient awareness and the feasibility of mediation as an alternative conflict resolution method in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 40 Bulgarian citizens was conducted to evaluate their experiences with physician-patient communication, their opinions regarding the effectiveness of the legal system, and their awareness of mediation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the findings, more than half of the respondents reported difficulties communicating with their physicians, and only 5% believed the judicial system was effective in resolving disputes in healthcare. While many were familiar with mediation, only 2.5% had used it to address healthcare-related problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study underscores the need for targeted education and trust-building initiatives to facilitate the implementation of mediation in healthcare. Improving patient-physician communication and introducing mediation could enhance healthcare quality and patients' trust, providing a more efficient and satisfactory conflict resolution mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: The healthcare system is complex and emotionally charged, which frequently leads to conflicts between patients and healthcare providers as a result of inadequate communication and unmet patient expectations. This pilot study investigates patient awareness and the feasibility of mediation as an alternative conflict resolution method in healthcare.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 40 Bulgarian citizens was conducted to evaluate their experiences with physician-patient communication, their opinions regarding the effectiveness of the legal system, and their awareness of mediation.
Results: According to the findings, more than half of the respondents reported difficulties communicating with their physicians, and only 5% believed the judicial system was effective in resolving disputes in healthcare. While many were familiar with mediation, only 2.5% had used it to address healthcare-related problems.
Conclusions: This pilot study underscores the need for targeted education and trust-building initiatives to facilitate the implementation of mediation in healthcare. Improving patient-physician communication and introducing mediation could enhance healthcare quality and patients' trust, providing a more efficient and satisfactory conflict resolution mechanism.
期刊介绍：
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
