The Perspectives of General Practitioners on the Roles and Competences of Nurses During a Euthanasia Process: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dennis Demedts, Rosalie-Marianne Mathé, Johan Bilsen
{"title":"The Perspectives of General Practitioners on the Roles and Competences of Nurses During a Euthanasia Process: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Dennis Demedts, Rosalie-Marianne Mathé, Johan Bilsen","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13060595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The legalization of euthanasia in Belgium in 2002 positioned nurses as possible participants in the euthanasia process. However, ethical and legal dilemmas necessitate clear definitions of their roles and competencies in this context. Given that general practitioners (GPs) are the primary medical professionals performing euthanasia, understanding their perspectives on the roles of nurses is crucial. <b>Aim:</b> This study aims to describe GPs' perceptions of the roles and competencies of nurses during the euthanasia process. The research question addressed is as follows: \"What are GPs' views on the roles and competencies of nurses in euthanasia?\". <b>Methods:</b> A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among licensed GPs in Flanders, Belgium. Data were collected via an online survey using Qualtrics and analyzed with SPSS Statistics. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the university. <b>Results:</b> The study included responses from 237 GPs. GPs value the roles and competencies of nurses, recognizing euthanasia as a multidisciplinary process. They acknowledge the critical support nurses provide to patients and their families. GPs assert that the administration of euthanasia medication should remain the exclusive responsibility of the GP. The analysis further indicated that demographic factors did not significantly influence the results. <b>Discussion/Conclusions:</b> GPs in Belgium generally rated the roles and competencies of nurses positively. Enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration, legislating the roles of nurses, and incorporating practical euthanasia training in nursing curricula, e.g., via simulations, are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The legalization of euthanasia in Belgium in 2002 positioned nurses as possible participants in the euthanasia process. However, ethical and legal dilemmas necessitate clear definitions of their roles and competencies in this context. Given that general practitioners (GPs) are the primary medical professionals performing euthanasia, understanding their perspectives on the roles of nurses is crucial. Aim: This study aims to describe GPs' perceptions of the roles and competencies of nurses during the euthanasia process. The research question addressed is as follows: "What are GPs' views on the roles and competencies of nurses in euthanasia?". Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among licensed GPs in Flanders, Belgium. Data were collected via an online survey using Qualtrics and analyzed with SPSS Statistics. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the university. Results: The study included responses from 237 GPs. GPs value the roles and competencies of nurses, recognizing euthanasia as a multidisciplinary process. They acknowledge the critical support nurses provide to patients and their families. GPs assert that the administration of euthanasia medication should remain the exclusive responsibility of the GP. The analysis further indicated that demographic factors did not significantly influence the results. Discussion/Conclusions: GPs in Belgium generally rated the roles and competencies of nurses positively. Enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration, legislating the roles of nurses, and incorporating practical euthanasia training in nursing curricula, e.g., via simulations, are recommended.

全科医生对安乐死过程中护士角色和能力的看法:一项横断面研究。
背景:2002年比利时的安乐死合法化将护士定位为安乐死过程的可能参与者。然而,道德和法律上的困境需要明确界定他们在这方面的作用和能力。鉴于全科医生(gp)是执行安乐死的主要医疗专业人员,了解他们对护士角色的看法至关重要。目的:本研究旨在描述全科医生对安乐死过程中护士角色和能力的看法。研究的问题如下:“全科医生对护士在安乐死中的角色和能力有什么看法?”方法:对比利时法兰德斯执业全科医生进行定量横断面调查。数据通过Qualtrics在线调查收集,并使用SPSS统计软件进行分析。获得了学校医学伦理委员会的伦理批准。结果:研究包括237名全科医生的回复。全科医生重视护士的角色和能力,认识到安乐死是一个多学科的过程。他们承认护士为病人及其家属提供的重要支持。全科医生主张安乐死药物的管理应该是全科医生的专属责任。分析进一步表明,人口因素对结果没有显著影响。讨论/结论:比利时的全科医生普遍认为护士的角色和能力是积极的。建议加强多学科合作,立法规定护士的角色,并将实用的安乐死培训纳入护理课程,例如通过模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信