Comparing youth-friendly clinics to the standard of care for adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A qualitative analysis.

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2481466

Twambilile Phanga, Caroline N McKay, Dhrutika Vansia, Nivedita L Bhushan, Bertha Maseko, Linda E Kamtsendero, Lauren A Graybill, Mina C Hosseinipour, Linda-Gail Bekker, Audrey Pettifor, Nora E Rosenberg

{"title":"Comparing youth-friendly clinics to the standard of care for adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A qualitative analysis.","authors":"Twambilile Phanga, Caroline N McKay, Dhrutika Vansia, Nivedita L Bhushan, Bertha Maseko, Linda E Kamtsendero, Lauren A Graybill, Mina C Hosseinipour, Linda-Gail Bekker, Audrey Pettifor, Nora E Rosenberg","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2481466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face difficulties accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Youth-friendly service delivery models may prove an alternative to increase SRH service uptake. This analysis utilises evidence from the Girl Power-Malawi study, a study designed to compare the impact of different models of service delivery on SRH service uptake for AGYW. Three intervention clinics trained providers in youth-friendly health services (YFHS), engaged young peer educators in patient outreach, expanded hours and integrated various services into youth-dedicated spaces. A standard of care (SOC) clinic was included as a comparator. This paper draws on qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 60 participants (15 per clinic) and 8 focus group discussions (2 per clinic). Thematic analysis identified three key themes regarding SRH service acceptability: having peer educators made AGYW feel more comfortable seeking services; AGYW perceived services at intervention clinics to be more private; and clinic modifications such as free services, longer operating hours and integration of different SRH services made services easier to access. Adolescents expressed that these factors contributed to higher service uptake in intervention clinics. Youth-friendly service provisions are needed to ensure AGYW find care-seeking acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2481466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2481466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face difficulties accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Youth-friendly service delivery models may prove an alternative to increase SRH service uptake. This analysis utilises evidence from the Girl Power-Malawi study, a study designed to compare the impact of different models of service delivery on SRH service uptake for AGYW. Three intervention clinics trained providers in youth-friendly health services (YFHS), engaged young peer educators in patient outreach, expanded hours and integrated various services into youth-dedicated spaces. A standard of care (SOC) clinic was included as a comparator. This paper draws on qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 60 participants (15 per clinic) and 8 focus group discussions (2 per clinic). Thematic analysis identified three key themes regarding SRH service acceptability: having peer educators made AGYW feel more comfortable seeking services; AGYW perceived services at intervention clinics to be more private; and clinic modifications such as free services, longer operating hours and integration of different SRH services made services easier to access. Adolescents expressed that these factors contributed to higher service uptake in intervention clinics. Youth-friendly service provisions are needed to ensure AGYW find care-seeking acceptable.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

3.00%

发文量

120

期刊介绍： Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.