The association between sleep and fecundability: a Danish preconception cohort study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mai Hougaard Christensen, Ellen Margrethe Mikkelsen, Lauren Anne Wise, Elizabeth Elliott Hatch, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen
{"title":"The association between sleep and fecundability: a Danish preconception cohort study.","authors":"Mai Hougaard Christensen, Ellen Margrethe Mikkelsen, Lauren Anne Wise, Elizabeth Elliott Hatch, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We estimated the effects of sleep duration, trouble sleeping, and job time (day, evening, shift, and night work) on fecundability, the per-cycle probability of conception. We analysed data from a preconception cohort study of 10 475 Danish females aged 18-45 years attempting to conceive. On baseline questionnaires, females reported on sleep duration (hours/day), trouble sleeping (never, sometimes, approx. 50% of the time, most of the time), and job time. Pregnancy status was ascertained from follow-up questionnaires completed every 8 weeks for up to 12 months. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs), adjusted for potential confounders. Compared with 8 h/day of sleep, FRs were 0.94 for ≤6 h/day (95% CI, 0.83-1.08), 0.97 for 7 h/day (95% CI, 0.89-1.06), and 0.96 for ≥9 h/day (95% CI, 0.81-1.13). Compared with no trouble sleeping, FRs were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06) for trouble sleeping sometimes, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.03) for trouble sleeping approx. 50% of the time, and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.10) for trouble sleeping most of the time. Relative to day work, FRs were 1.12 for shift work (95% CI, 1.04-1.20), 0.77 for night work (95% CI, 0.49-1.22) and 1.10 for evening work (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). Self-reported sleep duration and trouble sleeping were not appreciably associated with fecundability. Shift work was associated with a slightly higher fecundability, while night work was associated with slightly lower fecundability, although associations were imprecise. Potential limitations include misclassification of sleep and residual or unmeasured confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimated the effects of sleep duration, trouble sleeping, and job time (day, evening, shift, and night work) on fecundability, the per-cycle probability of conception. We analysed data from a preconception cohort study of 10 475 Danish females aged 18-45 years attempting to conceive. On baseline questionnaires, females reported on sleep duration (hours/day), trouble sleeping (never, sometimes, approx. 50% of the time, most of the time), and job time. Pregnancy status was ascertained from follow-up questionnaires completed every 8 weeks for up to 12 months. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs), adjusted for potential confounders. Compared with 8 h/day of sleep, FRs were 0.94 for ≤6 h/day (95% CI, 0.83-1.08), 0.97 for 7 h/day (95% CI, 0.89-1.06), and 0.96 for ≥9 h/day (95% CI, 0.81-1.13). Compared with no trouble sleeping, FRs were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06) for trouble sleeping sometimes, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.03) for trouble sleeping approx. 50% of the time, and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.10) for trouble sleeping most of the time. Relative to day work, FRs were 1.12 for shift work (95% CI, 1.04-1.20), 0.77 for night work (95% CI, 0.49-1.22) and 1.10 for evening work (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). Self-reported sleep duration and trouble sleeping were not appreciably associated with fecundability. Shift work was associated with a slightly higher fecundability, while night work was associated with slightly lower fecundability, although associations were imprecise. Potential limitations include misclassification of sleep and residual or unmeasured confounding.

睡眠与生育能力之间的关系:丹麦孕前队列研究。
我们估计了睡眠时间、睡眠问题和工作时间(白天、晚上、轮班和夜间工作)对生育能力和每个周期受孕概率的影响。我们分析了一项来自10475名年龄在18-45岁的丹麦女性孕前队列研究的数据。在基线调查问卷中,女性报告了睡眠持续时间(小时/天)、睡眠困难(从未,有时,大约。50%的时间,大部分时间)和工作时间。在长达12个月的时间里,通过每8周完成一次的随访问卷来确定妊娠状况。我们使用比例概率回归模型来估计受孕率(FRs),并对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。与8小时/天相比,≤6小时/天的FRs为0.94 (95% CI, 0.83-1.08), 7小时/天的FRs为0.97 (95% CI, 0.89-1.06),≥9小时/天的FRs为0.96 (95% CI, 0.81-1.13)。与无睡眠困难组相比,有时睡眠困难组的FRs为1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06),近似睡眠困难组的FRs为0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.03)。50%的时间和0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.10)的时间睡眠困难。相对于白班工作,轮班工作的FRs为1.12 (95% CI, 1.04-1.20),夜班工作的FRs为0.77 (95% CI, 0.49-1.22),夜班工作的FRs为1.10 (95% CI, 0.91-1.33)。自我报告的睡眠时间和睡眠困难与生育能力没有明显的联系。倒班工作与稍高的生育能力相关,而夜班工作与稍低的生育能力相关,尽管这种关联并不精确。潜在的限制包括睡眠的错误分类和残留或未测量的混杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信