Utility of Routine Preoperative Urinalysis in Elective Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stevin Lu, Ian Marquez, Hania Shahzad, Jonathan Ochoa, Kanwar Parhar, Muhammad Jawad, Rolando Roberto, Yashar Javidan, Safdar Khan, Eric Klineberg, Hai Le
{"title":"Utility of Routine Preoperative Urinalysis in Elective Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery.","authors":"Stevin Lu, Ian Marquez, Hania Shahzad, Jonathan Ochoa, Kanwar Parhar, Muhammad Jawad, Rolando Roberto, Yashar Javidan, Safdar Khan, Eric Klineberg, Hai Le","doi":"10.1177/21925682251330593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignA retrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of routine preoperative urinalysis as a predictor of postoperative complications following elective lumbar fusion surgery (ELFS).MethodsThis study included a retrospective review of patients aged ≥18 years-old who underwent ELFS for degenerative pathology between 2018 to 2022 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: No Urinalysis (No-UA), Negative Urinalysis (Negative-UA), and Positive Urinalysis (Positive-UA). A retrospective review of medical records was conducted including patient characteristics and clinical factors of interest. Emergency department (ED) visits and return to the operating room (OR) within 3-months postoperatively were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using bivariate and multivariate analysis.ResultsA total of 493 patients were included. Despite having higher rates of preoperative antibiotics administered, patients with a positive urinalysis were significantly more likely to present with postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) than the No-UA and Negative-UA groups. No significant differences were seen in other types of complications including pneumonia, bacteremia, superficial wound infections, deep wound infections, and wound dehiscence between the 3 groups. Additionally, rates of return to OR, return to ED, reinsertion of foley catheters, duration of indwelling catheterization, and hospital length of stay had no significant differences between the groups.ConclusionThis study suggests there may be a limited role in performing routine preoperative urinalysis prior to ELFS. This study may help further improve preoperative assessment guidelines and assist with patient counseling and considerations prior to elective lumbar fusion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251330593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251330593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignA retrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of routine preoperative urinalysis as a predictor of postoperative complications following elective lumbar fusion surgery (ELFS).MethodsThis study included a retrospective review of patients aged ≥18 years-old who underwent ELFS for degenerative pathology between 2018 to 2022 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: No Urinalysis (No-UA), Negative Urinalysis (Negative-UA), and Positive Urinalysis (Positive-UA). A retrospective review of medical records was conducted including patient characteristics and clinical factors of interest. Emergency department (ED) visits and return to the operating room (OR) within 3-months postoperatively were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using bivariate and multivariate analysis.ResultsA total of 493 patients were included. Despite having higher rates of preoperative antibiotics administered, patients with a positive urinalysis were significantly more likely to present with postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) than the No-UA and Negative-UA groups. No significant differences were seen in other types of complications including pneumonia, bacteremia, superficial wound infections, deep wound infections, and wound dehiscence between the 3 groups. Additionally, rates of return to OR, return to ED, reinsertion of foley catheters, duration of indwelling catheterization, and hospital length of stay had no significant differences between the groups.ConclusionThis study suggests there may be a limited role in performing routine preoperative urinalysis prior to ELFS. This study may help further improve preoperative assessment guidelines and assist with patient counseling and considerations prior to elective lumbar fusion surgery.

研究设计一项回顾性队列研究.Objective To evaluate the utility of routine preoperative urinalysis as a predictor of postoperative complications following elective lumbar fusion surgery (ELFS).Methods This study included a retrospective review of patients aged ≥18 years old who underwent ELFS for degenerative pathology between 2018 to 2022 at a single academic institution.患者分为 3 组:无尿检组(No-UA)、阴性尿检组(Negative-UA)和阳性尿检组(Positive-UA)。对病历进行回顾性分析,包括患者特征和相关临床因素。记录了急诊科(ED)就诊情况和术后 3 个月内重返手术室(OR)的情况。采用双变量和多变量分析方法进行了统计分析。尽管术前使用抗生素的比例较高,但尿液分析呈阳性的患者术后出现尿路感染(UTI)的几率明显高于无尿液分析组和阴性尿液分析组。其他类型的并发症,包括肺炎、菌血症、表皮伤口感染、深层伤口感染和伤口裂开,3 组之间没有明显差异。此外,返回手术室率、返回急诊室率、重新插入福里导管率、留置导管持续时间和住院时间在三组之间无明显差异。这项研究可能有助于进一步完善术前评估指南,并有助于在择期腰椎融合手术前为患者提供咨询和注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信