Comparative characterization of hydrogels from human amniotic membrane and umbilical cord: biological and physicochemical properties.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Keykavos Gholami, Roham Deyhimfar, Ehsan Arefian, Matin Sadat Saneei Mousavi, Zahra Fekrirad, Parsa Nikoufar, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
{"title":"Comparative characterization of hydrogels from human amniotic membrane and umbilical cord: biological and physicochemical properties.","authors":"Keykavos Gholami, Roham Deyhimfar, Ehsan Arefian, Matin Sadat Saneei Mousavi, Zahra Fekrirad, Parsa Nikoufar, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir","doi":"10.1080/03008207.2025.2483246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various forms of decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM), including patches, powders, and hydrogels, have been applied to tissue engineering. Due to a broad need for alternatives to dECM, mostly derived from animal sources, human amniotic membrane (AM) and umbilical cord (UC) as disposable birthing materials can be suitable candidates. The present study developed hydrogels from AM and UC hydrogels and compared their physicochemical and biological properties.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The decellularized and powdered AM and UC tissues were solubilized with pepsin to form pre-gel solutions. The developed hydrogels underwent biological and physicochemical assessments using techniques such as western blot, scanning electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UC hydrogel demonstrated a higher elastic modulus and shorter gelation time. Although the western blot results did not show significant differences in concentration of the main ECM components, specific staining showed a higher content of mucopolysaccharides in UC hydrogel as well as collagen fibers in AM hydrogel. Both hydrogels induced a fibroblast-like morphology in the cytoplasm of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Both hydrogels are suitable for 3D culture systems and support in vivo myogenic differentiation of MSCs. Finally, the hydrogels were found to be biocompatible in vivo and showed infiltration and colonization by host cells in mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant bio-physicochemical variations between human UC and AM hydrogels, emphasizing the need for careful consideration in their application for tissue reconstruction, in vitro culture systems, and cell-delivery techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":10661,"journal":{"name":"Connective Tissue Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connective Tissue Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008207.2025.2483246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various forms of decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM), including patches, powders, and hydrogels, have been applied to tissue engineering. Due to a broad need for alternatives to dECM, mostly derived from animal sources, human amniotic membrane (AM) and umbilical cord (UC) as disposable birthing materials can be suitable candidates. The present study developed hydrogels from AM and UC hydrogels and compared their physicochemical and biological properties.

Materials and methods: The decellularized and powdered AM and UC tissues were solubilized with pepsin to form pre-gel solutions. The developed hydrogels underwent biological and physicochemical assessments using techniques such as western blot, scanning electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and histopathology.

Results: UC hydrogel demonstrated a higher elastic modulus and shorter gelation time. Although the western blot results did not show significant differences in concentration of the main ECM components, specific staining showed a higher content of mucopolysaccharides in UC hydrogel as well as collagen fibers in AM hydrogel. Both hydrogels induced a fibroblast-like morphology in the cytoplasm of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Both hydrogels are suitable for 3D culture systems and support in vivo myogenic differentiation of MSCs. Finally, the hydrogels were found to be biocompatible in vivo and showed infiltration and colonization by host cells in mice.

Conclusion: This study highlights significant bio-physicochemical variations between human UC and AM hydrogels, emphasizing the need for careful consideration in their application for tissue reconstruction, in vitro culture systems, and cell-delivery techniques.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Connective Tissue Research
Connective Tissue Research 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Connective Tissue Research is to present original and significant research in all basic areas of connective tissue and matrix biology. The journal also provides topical reviews and, on occasion, the proceedings of conferences in areas of special interest at which original work is presented. The journal supports an interdisciplinary approach; we present a variety of perspectives from different disciplines, including Biochemistry Cell and Molecular Biology Immunology Structural Biology Biophysics Biomechanics Regenerative Medicine The interests of the Editorial Board are to understand, mechanistically, the structure-function relationships in connective tissue extracellular matrix, and its associated cells, through interpretation of sophisticated experimentation using state-of-the-art technologies that include molecular genetics, imaging, immunology, biomechanics and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信