Knowledge, attitudes and barriers to uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Uganda, February 2021.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bob Omoda Amodan, Patricia Thiwe Okumu, John Kamulegeya, Alex Ndyabakira, Geoffrey Amanya, Daniel Jacob Emong, Aggrey Byaruhanga, Job Morukileng, Alex Riolexus Ario
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and barriers to uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Uganda, February 2021.","authors":"Bob Omoda Amodan, Patricia Thiwe Okumu, John Kamulegeya, Alex Ndyabakira, Geoffrey Amanya, Daniel Jacob Emong, Aggrey Byaruhanga, Job Morukileng, Alex Riolexus Ario","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Uganda planned to start its COVID-19 vaccination campaign in March 2021, prioritising healthcare workers, security personnel, elderly and people with comorbidities. However, the willingness to receive the vaccine and potential barriers and hindrances were unknown. To understand the barriers to uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine prior to its rollout, we explored the communities' knowledge, attitudes and barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study in Kampala and Ankole subregions in February 2021. For the household survey, we used three-stage sampling to select three districts in each subregion and, thereafter, 12 villages per district. One adult in each household was interviewed. Additionally, we conducted focus group discussions and key informant interviews to explore knowledge, attitudes and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination. Modified Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with willingness to receive to COVID-19 vaccine RESULTS: Among 1728 respondents, 52% were under 40 years old, and 67% were female. Fifty-nine percent of those who had heard of the vaccine primarly obtained information from radio and television (TV). Despite one-quarter reporting that they had heard that the vaccine could cause death or genetic changes, 85% were willing to receive it. Persons in the Kampala subregion were less willing than those in the Ankole subregion to take the vaccine (76% vs 94%, adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR)=0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.89). Trust in the effectiveness of non-vaccine COVID-19 preventive measures (aPR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.99), living in urban areas (aPR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.91) and lack of information on vaccine safety (aPR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.93) reduced interest in taking the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccine willingness was high despite some misinformation and safety concerns, which more prevalent in Kampala than in the Ankole subregion. While radio and TV were major sources of COVID-19 vaccine information, social media was the biggest propagator of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Therefore, providing credible information about vaccine safety could reinforce uptake, especially among urban residents. Additionally, local and national leaders should publicise their acceptance of vaccines and debunk misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Uganda planned to start its COVID-19 vaccination campaign in March 2021, prioritising healthcare workers, security personnel, elderly and people with comorbidities. However, the willingness to receive the vaccine and potential barriers and hindrances were unknown. To understand the barriers to uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine prior to its rollout, we explored the communities' knowledge, attitudes and barriers.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study in Kampala and Ankole subregions in February 2021. For the household survey, we used three-stage sampling to select three districts in each subregion and, thereafter, 12 villages per district. One adult in each household was interviewed. Additionally, we conducted focus group discussions and key informant interviews to explore knowledge, attitudes and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination. Modified Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with willingness to receive to COVID-19 vaccine RESULTS: Among 1728 respondents, 52% were under 40 years old, and 67% were female. Fifty-nine percent of those who had heard of the vaccine primarly obtained information from radio and television (TV). Despite one-quarter reporting that they had heard that the vaccine could cause death or genetic changes, 85% were willing to receive it. Persons in the Kampala subregion were less willing than those in the Ankole subregion to take the vaccine (76% vs 94%, adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR)=0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.89). Trust in the effectiveness of non-vaccine COVID-19 preventive measures (aPR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.99), living in urban areas (aPR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.91) and lack of information on vaccine safety (aPR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.93) reduced interest in taking the vaccine.

Conclusions: Vaccine willingness was high despite some misinformation and safety concerns, which more prevalent in Kampala than in the Ankole subregion. While radio and TV were major sources of COVID-19 vaccine information, social media was the biggest propagator of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Therefore, providing credible information about vaccine safety could reinforce uptake, especially among urban residents. Additionally, local and national leaders should publicise their acceptance of vaccines and debunk misinformation.

乌干达对接种 COVID-19 疫苗的认识、态度和障碍,2021 年 2 月。
乌干达计划于2021年3月启动COVID-19疫苗接种运动,优先考虑卫生保健工作者、安全人员、老年人和合并症患者。然而,接种疫苗的意愿以及潜在的障碍和障碍尚不清楚。为了了解在COVID-19疫苗推出之前接受疫苗的障碍,我们探讨了社区的知识、态度和障碍。方法:我们于2021年2月在坎帕拉和安科莱次区域进行了一项混合方法横断面研究。对于住户调查,我们采用三阶段抽样方法,在每个分区域选择三个区,然后每个区选择12个村。每个家庭中有一位成年人接受了采访。此外,我们还进行了焦点小组讨论和关键信息提供者访谈,以探讨COVID-19疫苗接种的知识、态度和障碍。结果:在1728名受访者中,52%的人年龄在40岁以下,67%为女性。59%听说过疫苗的人主要是从广播和电视上获得信息的。尽管四分之一的人称他们听说过疫苗会导致死亡或基因改变,但85%的人愿意接种。坎帕拉分区域的人比安科勒分区域的人更不愿意接种疫苗(76%对94%,调整患病率(aPR)=0.85, 95% CI: 0.81至0.89)。对非疫苗COVID-19预防措施有效性的信任(aPR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80至0.99)、生活在城市地区(aPR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.76至0.91)以及缺乏疫苗安全性信息(aPR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.83至0.93)降低了接种疫苗的兴趣。结论:尽管存在一些错误信息和安全问题,但疫苗意愿很高,这在坎帕拉比在安科莱分区域更为普遍。虽然广播和电视是新冠病毒疫苗信息的主要来源,但社交媒体是新冠病毒疫苗错误信息的最大传播者。因此,提供有关疫苗安全性的可靠信息可以加强接种,特别是在城市居民中。此外,地方和国家领导人应宣传他们接受疫苗并揭穿错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信