Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Interleukin 12/23 Inhibitors for the Remission of Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Nouran Alwisi, Rana Ismail, Hissa Al-Kuwari, Khalifa H Al-Ansari, Mohammed A Al-Matwi, Noor A Aweer, Wejdan N Al-Marri, Yousif Al-Kubaisi, Muneera Al-Mohannadi, Shahd Hamran, Suhail A R Doi, Habib H Farooqui, Tawanda Chivese
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Interleukin 12/23 Inhibitors for the Remission of Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Nouran Alwisi, Rana Ismail, Hissa Al-Kuwari, Khalifa H Al-Ansari, Mohammed A Al-Matwi, Noor A Aweer, Wejdan N Al-Marri, Yousif Al-Kubaisi, Muneera Al-Mohannadi, Shahd Hamran, Suhail A R Doi, Habib H Farooqui, Tawanda Chivese","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines13030702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Interleukin 12/23 inhibitors are a newer class of monoclonal antibodies used to induce and maintain remission for Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, when patients do not respond to conventional immunomodulatory drugs or first-line monoclonal antibody therapies. Although biologics are best administered intravenously, subcutaneous administration has been trialed, with mixed results. This research synthesized evidence on the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous compared to intravenous administration of interleukin 12/23 inhibitors for moderate to severe CD. <b>Methods</b>: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Cochrane, PubMed, SCOPUS, CINHAL, and preprint archives for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous to intravenous interleukin 12/23 inhibitors for the remission of CD. After study quality assessment, a meta-analysis was carried out using a bias-adjusted inverse variance heterogeneity model, heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup>, and publication bias was performed using Doi plots. Evidence certainty was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). <b>Results</b>: Seven RCTs, with 2179 participants, all with moderate to severe CD, were included. After meta-analysis, subcutaneous compared to intravenous administration showed similar efficacy for the induction of remission (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.53-1.12), with no-to-low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.97). For the maintenance of remission, only two studies had analyzable data, and they showed that subcutaneous interleukin 12/23 inhibitors were equal or better compared to intravenous administration. Further syntheses showed that subcutaneous compared to intravenous administration of interleukin 12/23 inhibitors had almost similar odds of adverse events (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.63-1.32, I<sup>2</sup> = 39%), serious adverse events (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.61-1.53, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and treatment discontinuation (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.67-1.68, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In individuals with moderate to severe CD, subcutaneous administration has similar efficacy for inducing remission with comparable safety. More RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Interleukin 12/23 inhibitors are a newer class of monoclonal antibodies used to induce and maintain remission for Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, when patients do not respond to conventional immunomodulatory drugs or first-line monoclonal antibody therapies. Although biologics are best administered intravenously, subcutaneous administration has been trialed, with mixed results. This research synthesized evidence on the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous compared to intravenous administration of interleukin 12/23 inhibitors for moderate to severe CD. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Cochrane, PubMed, SCOPUS, CINHAL, and preprint archives for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous to intravenous interleukin 12/23 inhibitors for the remission of CD. After study quality assessment, a meta-analysis was carried out using a bias-adjusted inverse variance heterogeneity model, heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and publication bias was performed using Doi plots. Evidence certainty was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Results: Seven RCTs, with 2179 participants, all with moderate to severe CD, were included. After meta-analysis, subcutaneous compared to intravenous administration showed similar efficacy for the induction of remission (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.53-1.12), with no-to-low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.97). For the maintenance of remission, only two studies had analyzable data, and they showed that subcutaneous interleukin 12/23 inhibitors were equal or better compared to intravenous administration. Further syntheses showed that subcutaneous compared to intravenous administration of interleukin 12/23 inhibitors had almost similar odds of adverse events (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.63-1.32, I2 = 39%), serious adverse events (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.61-1.53, I2 = 0%), and treatment discontinuation (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.67-1.68, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: In individuals with moderate to severe CD, subcutaneous administration has similar efficacy for inducing remission with comparable safety. More RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

背景/目标:白细胞介素 12/23 抑制剂是一类较新的单克隆抗体,当患者对常规免疫调节药物或一线单克隆抗体疗法无反应时,可用于诱导和维持克罗恩病(CD)(一种慢性炎症性肠病)的缓解。虽然生物制剂最适合静脉给药,但皮下给药也曾试用过,结果喜忧参半。本研究综合了皮下注射白细胞介素 12/23 抑制剂与静脉注射白细胞介素 12/23 抑制剂治疗中重度 CD 的疗效和安全性方面的证据。方法:在这项系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们检索了 Cochrane、PubMed、SCOPUS、CINHAL 和预印本档案,以寻找比较皮下注射和静脉注射白细胞介素 12/23 抑制剂对缓解 CD 的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验 (RCT)。在对研究质量进行评估后,使用偏倚调整的反方差异质性模型进行了荟萃分析,使用I2评估了异质性,并使用Doi图进行了发表偏倚评估。证据确定性采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)进行评估。结果共纳入 7 项 RCT,2179 名参与者,均为中度至重度 CD 患者。经过荟萃分析,皮下注射与静脉注射在诱导缓解方面的疗效相似(OR 0.77,95%CI 0.53-1.12),无至低异质性(I2 = 0%,P = 0.97)。在维持缓解方面,只有两项研究有可分析的数据,它们显示皮下注射白细胞介素12/23抑制剂与静脉注射白细胞介素12/23抑制剂效果相当或更好。进一步的综合研究显示,皮下注射白细胞介素12/23抑制剂与静脉注射白细胞介素12/23抑制剂相比,发生不良事件(OR 0.91,95%CI 0.63-1.32,I2 = 39%)、严重不良事件(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.61-1.53,I2 = 0%)和中断治疗(OR 1.06,95%CI 0.67-1.68,I2 = 0%)的几率几乎相似。结论对于中度至重度 CD 患者,皮下注射具有类似的诱导缓解疗效,且安全性相当。需要更多的 RCT 研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信