Anesthesiology Resident Demographics and the BASIC Examination Pass Rates.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007490
Huaping Sun, Ann E Harman, John D Mitchell, Robert R Gaiser, Stacie G Deiner
{"title":"Anesthesiology Resident Demographics and the BASIC Examination Pass Rates.","authors":"Huaping Sun, Ann E Harman, John D Mitchell, Robert R Gaiser, Stacie G Deiner","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BASIC Examination was added to the US examination system for anesthesiology certification in 2014. The American Board of Anesthesiology conducted retrospective analyses to assess whether resident demographics, program characteristics, and/or prior examination performance were associated with first-time BASIC pass rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthesiology residents who took the BASIC Examination for the first time from July 2014 to November 2022 were eligible to participate, and they had at least 2 more attempts (or opportunities to attempt) through December 2023. First-time and eventual pass rates (ie, based on up to 3 attempts) were calculated for each demographic group. For those residents who had the clinical base year in-training examination (CBY ITE) scores available, demographic group performance differences on this examination were first examined. Mixed-effects logistical regression models assessed how resident demographics, program characteristics, and/or prior CBY ITE scores were associated with the odds of passing the BASIC the first time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses included 17,286 examination attempts from 15,789 residents. The majority of residents were male (65.8%), non-Hispanic or Latino (76.2%), White (47.8%), and US medical school graduates (87.4%). Differences in the first-attempt BASIC pass rates included male (92.7%) vs female (88.1%), non-Hispanic or Latino (92.0%) vs Hispanic or Latino (85.8%), Asian (92.6%) and White (92.4%) vs Black/African American (81.9%), respectively, and US (91.5%) vs international (88.6%) medical school graduates. Females had significantly lower odds of passing the BASIC the first time than males (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.60); Black/African American residents (OR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.33-0.51) and Middle Eastern or North African residents (OR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.46-0.91) had lower odds of passing the BASIC on first attempt than White residents; Hispanic or Latino residents had lower odds of passing the BASIC initially than non-Hispanic or Latino residents (OR = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.42-0.64). Nevertheless, all demographic subgroups' eventual pass rates were >99%.Male and White residents outperformed female and Black/African American residents, respectively, in CBY ITEs. The gender and race performance gaps in the first-time BASIC pass rates were attenuated but not eliminated after controlling for their CBY ITE scores-compared to male and White residents, respectively, the odds of passing the BASIC the first time changed from 46% to 56% for female residents, and from 41% to 53% for Black/African American residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female and nonwhite residents had lower first-time BASIC Examination pass rates. Almost all trainees passed by their up-to-third attempts. Future studies are needed to understand the basis of these differences and identify opportunities for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"988-994"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The BASIC Examination was added to the US examination system for anesthesiology certification in 2014. The American Board of Anesthesiology conducted retrospective analyses to assess whether resident demographics, program characteristics, and/or prior examination performance were associated with first-time BASIC pass rates.

Methods: Anesthesiology residents who took the BASIC Examination for the first time from July 2014 to November 2022 were eligible to participate, and they had at least 2 more attempts (or opportunities to attempt) through December 2023. First-time and eventual pass rates (ie, based on up to 3 attempts) were calculated for each demographic group. For those residents who had the clinical base year in-training examination (CBY ITE) scores available, demographic group performance differences on this examination were first examined. Mixed-effects logistical regression models assessed how resident demographics, program characteristics, and/or prior CBY ITE scores were associated with the odds of passing the BASIC the first time.

Results: The analyses included 17,286 examination attempts from 15,789 residents. The majority of residents were male (65.8%), non-Hispanic or Latino (76.2%), White (47.8%), and US medical school graduates (87.4%). Differences in the first-attempt BASIC pass rates included male (92.7%) vs female (88.1%), non-Hispanic or Latino (92.0%) vs Hispanic or Latino (85.8%), Asian (92.6%) and White (92.4%) vs Black/African American (81.9%), respectively, and US (91.5%) vs international (88.6%) medical school graduates. Females had significantly lower odds of passing the BASIC the first time than males (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.60); Black/African American residents (OR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.33-0.51) and Middle Eastern or North African residents (OR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.46-0.91) had lower odds of passing the BASIC on first attempt than White residents; Hispanic or Latino residents had lower odds of passing the BASIC initially than non-Hispanic or Latino residents (OR = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.42-0.64). Nevertheless, all demographic subgroups' eventual pass rates were >99%.Male and White residents outperformed female and Black/African American residents, respectively, in CBY ITEs. The gender and race performance gaps in the first-time BASIC pass rates were attenuated but not eliminated after controlling for their CBY ITE scores-compared to male and White residents, respectively, the odds of passing the BASIC the first time changed from 46% to 56% for female residents, and from 41% to 53% for Black/African American residents.

Conclusions: Female and nonwhite residents had lower first-time BASIC Examination pass rates. Almost all trainees passed by their up-to-third attempts. Future studies are needed to understand the basis of these differences and identify opportunities for improvement.

麻醉学住院医师人口统计和基本考试合格率。
背景:美国于2014年将BASIC考试纳入麻醉学认证考试体系。美国麻醉学委员会进行了回顾性分析,以评估居民人口统计、项目特征和/或先前的考试表现是否与BASIC首次通过率有关。方法:2014年7月至2022年11月首次参加BASIC考试的麻醉住院医师均符合参加资格,并在2023年12月之前至少有2次以上的尝试(或有机会尝试)。计算了每个人口统计组的首次通过率和最终通过率(即基于多达3次尝试)。对于那些有临床基础年培训检查(CBY ITE)分数的住院医师,首先检查人口统计学组在该检查中的表现差异。混合效应逻辑回归模型评估了居民人口统计、项目特征和/或先前CBY ITE分数与首次通过BASIC的几率之间的关系。结果:分析了15,789名居民的17,286次检查尝试。大多数居民为男性(65.8%)、非西班牙裔或拉丁裔(76.2%)、白人(47.8%)和美国医学院毕业生(87.4%)。首次尝试BASIC通过率的差异包括男性(92.7%)vs女性(88.1%),非西班牙裔或拉丁裔(92.0%)vs西班牙裔或拉丁裔(85.8%),亚洲(92.6%)和白人(92.4%)vs黑人/非洲裔美国人(81.9%),以及美国(91.5%)vs国际(88.6%)医学院毕业生。女性首次通过BASIC的几率明显低于男性(优势比[OR] = 0.53, 95%可信区间[CI], 0.47-0.60);黑人/非裔美国居民(OR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.33-0.51)和中东或北非居民(OR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.46-0.91)在第一次尝试中通过基础考试的几率低于白人居民;西班牙裔或拉丁裔居民最初通过基础考试的几率低于非西班牙裔或拉丁裔居民(or = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.42-0.64)。然而,所有人口分组的最终通过率都达到了99%。在CBY ITEs中,男性和白人居民的表现分别优于女性和黑人/非裔美国人。在控制了他们的CBY - ITE分数之后,首次通过BASIC通过率的性别和种族表现差距减弱了,但并没有消除——分别与男性和白人居民相比,女性居民第一次通过BASIC通过率从46%变化到56%,黑人/非裔美国人居民从41%变化到53%。结论:女性和非白人居民的首次基础考试通过率较低。几乎所有的学员都通过了三分之一的考试。未来的研究需要了解这些差异的基础,并确定改进的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信