Survivor-driven development of a PROM for use in routine colorectal cancer care.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Johanne D Lyhne, Lise Gade, Laila Hansen, Anne Johansen, Allan 'Ben' Smith, Lars Henrik Jensen, Lise Ventzel
{"title":"Survivor-driven development of a PROM for use in routine colorectal cancer care.","authors":"Johanne D Lyhne, Lise Gade, Laila Hansen, Anne Johansen, Allan 'Ben' Smith, Lars Henrik Jensen, Lise Ventzel","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Despite the availability of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) for assessing survivorship care needs, their successful implementation remains limited. This study aimed to improve the likelihood of implementation success by actively engaging end-users in developing a PROM designed to address implementation barriers.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Selected barriers for implementation were: (1) PROMs do not adequately address relevant issues, (2) PROMs can inhibit patient-clinician interaction, and (3) PROMs are not suitable for all patients. Management of these barriers were discussed at two 1-day workshops at Vejle Hospital with in-person attendance by colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and informal caregivers (ICs). Relevant issues of CRC survivorship care (barrier 1) were defined based on data from four distinct sources. Solutions to overcoming barriers 2 and 3 were discussed at the workshops. Workshop data were guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four distinct sources provided data from 4,545 CRC survivors. Thirteen individuals attended the in-person workshops. The following constructs were identified as relevant (barrier 1): self-rated well-being relative to pre-diagnosis, late effects encompassing both psychological and physical aspects, the role of caregivers, identity considerations, support systems, economic impacts, rehabilitation needs, and information provision. Specific element (e.g., keywords, prioritisation and agenda-setting) were incorporated to facilitate patient-clinician interactions (barrier 2). All constructs were considered relevant across all stages of CRC survivorship (barrier 3). The final PROM comprised 34 items.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This dialogue-tool is designed to address implementation barriers by providing direct feedback on relevant late effects and supportive care needs from CRC survivors to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"475-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Despite the availability of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) for assessing survivorship care needs, their successful implementation remains limited. This study aimed to improve the likelihood of implementation success by actively engaging end-users in developing a PROM designed to address implementation barriers.

Patients and methods: Selected barriers for implementation were: (1) PROMs do not adequately address relevant issues, (2) PROMs can inhibit patient-clinician interaction, and (3) PROMs are not suitable for all patients. Management of these barriers were discussed at two 1-day workshops at Vejle Hospital with in-person attendance by colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and informal caregivers (ICs). Relevant issues of CRC survivorship care (barrier 1) were defined based on data from four distinct sources. Solutions to overcoming barriers 2 and 3 were discussed at the workshops. Workshop data were guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) guide.

Results: The four distinct sources provided data from 4,545 CRC survivors. Thirteen individuals attended the in-person workshops. The following constructs were identified as relevant (barrier 1): self-rated well-being relative to pre-diagnosis, late effects encompassing both psychological and physical aspects, the role of caregivers, identity considerations, support systems, economic impacts, rehabilitation needs, and information provision. Specific element (e.g., keywords, prioritisation and agenda-setting) were incorporated to facilitate patient-clinician interactions (barrier 2). All constructs were considered relevant across all stages of CRC survivorship (barrier 3). The final PROM comprised 34 items.

Interpretation: This dialogue-tool is designed to address implementation barriers by providing direct feedback on relevant late effects and supportive care needs from CRC survivors to clinicians.

在结直肠癌常规治疗中使用的幸存者驱动的PROM开发。
背景和目的:尽管患者报告结果(PRO)措施(PROMs)可用于评估生存护理需求,但其成功实施仍然有限。本研究旨在通过积极参与最终用户开发旨在解决实现障碍的PROM,从而提高实现成功的可能性。患者和方法:选择的实施障碍是:(1)PROMs不能充分解决相关问题,(2)PROMs可以抑制患者与临床医生的互动,(3)PROMs并不适合所有患者。在Vejle医院举行的两个为期一天的研讨会上,讨论了这些障碍的管理问题,结直肠癌幸存者和非正式护理人员亲自参加了研讨会。基于四个不同来源的数据,定义了CRC生存护理的相关问题(障碍1)。讲习班讨论了克服障碍2和3的解决办法。工作坊数据以定性分析指南鲁汶(QUAGOL)指南为指导。结果:四个不同的来源提供了来自4,545名结直肠癌幸存者的数据。13人参加了面对面的讲习班。以下结构被确定为相关的(障碍1):相对于诊断前的自评幸福感,包括心理和身体方面的后期影响,照顾者的角色,身份考虑,支持系统,经济影响,康复需求和信息提供。纳入特定元素(如关键词、优先级和议程设置)以促进患者与临床医生的互动(障碍2)。所有构建都被认为与CRC生存的所有阶段相关(障碍3)。最终的PROM包括34个项目。解释:该对话工具旨在通过向临床医生提供有关CRC幸存者的相关晚期效应和支持性护理需求的直接反馈来解决实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信