DICTrank Is a Reliable Dataset for Cardiotoxicity Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Yanyan Qu, Ting Li, Zhichao Liu, Weida Tong, Dongying Li
{"title":"DICTrank Is a Reliable Dataset for Cardiotoxicity Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.","authors":"Yanyan Qu, Ting Li, Zhichao Liu, Weida Tong, Dongying Li","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT) is a significant challenge in drug development and public health. DICT can arise from various mechanisms; New Approach Methods (NAMs), including quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), have been extensively developed to predict DICT based solely on individual mechanisms (e.g., hERG-related cardiotoxicity) due to the availability of datasets limited to specific mechanisms. While these efforts have significantly contributed to our understanding of cardiotoxicity, DICT assessment remains challenging, suggesting that approaches focusing on isolated mechanisms may not provide a comprehensive evaluation. To address this, we previously developed DICTrank, the largest dataset for assessing overall cardiotoxicity liability in humans based on FDA drug labels. In this study, we evaluated the utility of DICTrank for QSAR modeling using five machine learning methods─Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Random Forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)─which vary in algorithmic complexity and explainability. To reflect real-world scenarios, models were trained on drugs approved before and within 2005 to predict the DICT risk of those approved thereafter. While we observed no clear association between prediction performance and model complexity, LR and XGBoost achieved the best results with DICTrank. Additionally, our significant-feature analyses with RF and XGBoost models provided novel insights into DICT mechanisms, revealing that drug properties associated with descriptors such as \"structural and topological\", \"polarizability\", and \"electronegativity\" contributed significantly to DICT. Moreover, we found that model performance varied by therapeutic category, suggesting the need to tailor models accordingly. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the robustness and reliability of DICTrank for cardiotoxicity prediction in humans using machine learning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT) is a significant challenge in drug development and public health. DICT can arise from various mechanisms; New Approach Methods (NAMs), including quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), have been extensively developed to predict DICT based solely on individual mechanisms (e.g., hERG-related cardiotoxicity) due to the availability of datasets limited to specific mechanisms. While these efforts have significantly contributed to our understanding of cardiotoxicity, DICT assessment remains challenging, suggesting that approaches focusing on isolated mechanisms may not provide a comprehensive evaluation. To address this, we previously developed DICTrank, the largest dataset for assessing overall cardiotoxicity liability in humans based on FDA drug labels. In this study, we evaluated the utility of DICTrank for QSAR modeling using five machine learning methods─Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Random Forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)─which vary in algorithmic complexity and explainability. To reflect real-world scenarios, models were trained on drugs approved before and within 2005 to predict the DICT risk of those approved thereafter. While we observed no clear association between prediction performance and model complexity, LR and XGBoost achieved the best results with DICTrank. Additionally, our significant-feature analyses with RF and XGBoost models provided novel insights into DICT mechanisms, revealing that drug properties associated with descriptors such as "structural and topological", "polarizability", and "electronegativity" contributed significantly to DICT. Moreover, we found that model performance varied by therapeutic category, suggesting the need to tailor models accordingly. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the robustness and reliability of DICTrank for cardiotoxicity prediction in humans using machine learning methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信