Assessment of forced evaporation as a solution for onsite produced water management

Travis Walla , Walter Den
{"title":"Assessment of forced evaporation as a solution for onsite produced water management","authors":"Travis Walla ,&nbsp;Walter Den","doi":"10.1016/j.wen.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flowback and produced water (FPW) is a major byproduct of unconventional oil and gas extraction operations. The sheer volume of FPW generated and its hypersaline and hazardous nature requires the water to be managed properly, such as underground injection. However, the increased awareness of the adverse environmental impacts associated with underground injection is expected to drive FPW management away from underground disposal. Meanwhile, the lack of data on the chemical constituents and the toxicological characteristics of treated FPW has likely hampered regulatory agencies in developing policies that enable advanced FPW treatment for reuse. Therefore, until a FPW reuse market emerges to justify the costs of advanced treatment, the most viable FPW management strategy for operators is to reduce the volume of FPW for disposal. This study examines the cost and environmental benefits of adopting an on-site thermal evaporation process through data collected from multiple developmental basins – the Rockies, Appalachia, and Haynesville basins using thermal evaporators. We developed a method for assessing the cost-benefit and applied it to a hypothetical scenario for Eagle Ford shale to demonstrate the potential benefits of thermal evaporation. The challenges and limitations are also discussed in this paper.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101279,"journal":{"name":"Water-Energy Nexus","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Energy Nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912525000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flowback and produced water (FPW) is a major byproduct of unconventional oil and gas extraction operations. The sheer volume of FPW generated and its hypersaline and hazardous nature requires the water to be managed properly, such as underground injection. However, the increased awareness of the adverse environmental impacts associated with underground injection is expected to drive FPW management away from underground disposal. Meanwhile, the lack of data on the chemical constituents and the toxicological characteristics of treated FPW has likely hampered regulatory agencies in developing policies that enable advanced FPW treatment for reuse. Therefore, until a FPW reuse market emerges to justify the costs of advanced treatment, the most viable FPW management strategy for operators is to reduce the volume of FPW for disposal. This study examines the cost and environmental benefits of adopting an on-site thermal evaporation process through data collected from multiple developmental basins – the Rockies, Appalachia, and Haynesville basins using thermal evaporators. We developed a method for assessing the cost-benefit and applied it to a hypothetical scenario for Eagle Ford shale to demonstrate the potential benefits of thermal evaporation. The challenges and limitations are also discussed in this paper.
评估强制蒸发作为现场采出水管理的解决方案
返排和采出水(FPW)是非常规油气开采作业的主要副产品。FPW的巨大产量及其高盐和危险性质要求对水进行适当的管理,例如地下注入。然而,随着人们越来越意识到地下注入对环境的不利影响,预计FPW管理将远离地下处置。与此同时,缺乏化学成分和处理后的FPW毒理学特征的数据可能会阻碍监管机构制定政策,使先进的FPW处理能够重复使用。因此,在FPW再利用市场出现以证明先进处理成本的合理性之前,运营商最可行的FPW管理策略是减少FPW的处理量。本研究通过使用热蒸发器从多个开发盆地(rocky mountains、Appalachia和Haynesville盆地)收集的数据,考察了采用现场热蒸发过程的成本和环境效益。我们开发了一种评估成本效益的方法,并将其应用于Eagle Ford页岩的假设场景,以证明热蒸发的潜在效益。本文还讨论了面临的挑战和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信