Michel Bédard , Hillary Maxwell , Isabelle Gélinas , Barbara Mazer , Gary Naglie , Michelle M. Porter , Mark J. Rapoport , Holly Tuokko , Brenda Vrkljan , Shawn Marshall
{"title":"Low uptake of driver refresher courses by older adults: An examination of potential explanatory variables using the Candrive cohort","authors":"Michel Bédard , Hillary Maxwell , Isabelle Gélinas , Barbara Mazer , Gary Naglie , Michelle M. Porter , Mark J. Rapoport , Holly Tuokko , Brenda Vrkljan , Shawn Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older drivers benefit from driver refresher courses, particularly courses with on-road training. Yet, the uptake of these courses and the factors associated with taking them is poorly documented.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from the Candrive prospective cohort (N = 928) to examine these issues using variables representing sociodemographic factors (e.g., age), health-related factors (e.g., medical conditions), and driving-related factors (e.g., driving comfort). The outcome variable was operationalized as having taken a non-mandatory refresher course in the last 10 years or never.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants’ mean age was 76.21 (SD = 4.85) and 576 (62.1 %) were males. Ninety-eight participants (10.6 %) reported having taken a non-mandatory refresher course within the last 10 years, and less than half of those reported that it included an on-road component. Only nine percent of participants had discussed driving with a physician. The multivariable regression model (N = 746; −2 log likelihood = 515.10, p < .001, Nagelkerke <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.12) identified five variables as statistically significant. The odds of having taken a course were higher with age (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI = 1.23, 1.92), when one’s driving was perceived as important for others (OR = 1.87, 95 % CI = 1.26, 2.80), and for participants who spoke to their family (OR = 1.80, 95 % CI = 1.04, 3.09) or to a physician about driving (OR = 2.24, 95 % CI = 1.15, 4.36); the odds were lower for those who benefited the most personally from driving (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI = 0.51, 0.82).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The uptake of driver refresher courses is low and few discussions about driving took place with physicians. Further research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to older drivers’ involvement in refresher courses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Older drivers benefit from driver refresher courses, particularly courses with on-road training. Yet, the uptake of these courses and the factors associated with taking them is poorly documented.
Methods
We used data from the Candrive prospective cohort (N = 928) to examine these issues using variables representing sociodemographic factors (e.g., age), health-related factors (e.g., medical conditions), and driving-related factors (e.g., driving comfort). The outcome variable was operationalized as having taken a non-mandatory refresher course in the last 10 years or never.
Results
Participants’ mean age was 76.21 (SD = 4.85) and 576 (62.1 %) were males. Ninety-eight participants (10.6 %) reported having taken a non-mandatory refresher course within the last 10 years, and less than half of those reported that it included an on-road component. Only nine percent of participants had discussed driving with a physician. The multivariable regression model (N = 746; −2 log likelihood = 515.10, p < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.12) identified five variables as statistically significant. The odds of having taken a course were higher with age (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI = 1.23, 1.92), when one’s driving was perceived as important for others (OR = 1.87, 95 % CI = 1.26, 2.80), and for participants who spoke to their family (OR = 1.80, 95 % CI = 1.04, 3.09) or to a physician about driving (OR = 2.24, 95 % CI = 1.15, 4.36); the odds were lower for those who benefited the most personally from driving (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI = 0.51, 0.82).
Conclusions
The uptake of driver refresher courses is low and few discussions about driving took place with physicians. Further research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to older drivers’ involvement in refresher courses.