{"title":"Contesting religious authority in response to government regulations on the prevention and handling of campus sexual violence (CSV) in Indonesia","authors":"Dzuriyatun Toyibah , Irma Riyani","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to the Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC) Indonesia is currently in a ‘state of emergency’ on the issue of Campus Sexual Violence (CSV). The Ministry recently issued a decree, Permendikbud 30/2021, to eliminate CSV. The decree has received various responses, both positive and negative. Scholars have begun to discuss CSV and the role of religious authorities or people/institutions who speak on behalf of Islam in Indonesia to address the issue. This article discusses the contestation between the conservative and female <em>ulama</em> (religious scholars), their rejection and acceptance responses, as well as demands that the decree be revised. Additionally, it discusses how female <em>ulama</em> have responded to the decree. Female <em>ulama</em> are challenging both the liberal label and stigma and the victimization approach that has led to the acceptance of sexual violence crimes. Applying a virtual ethnography, this article examines current newspaper articles and reports and social media statuses and comments which discuss the decree and cases of CSV in the period between November to December 2021. It argues that female <em>ulama</em> have become a new source of religious authority to challenge and contest male bias in religious interpretation on the prevention and handling of CSV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 103085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to the Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC) Indonesia is currently in a ‘state of emergency’ on the issue of Campus Sexual Violence (CSV). The Ministry recently issued a decree, Permendikbud 30/2021, to eliminate CSV. The decree has received various responses, both positive and negative. Scholars have begun to discuss CSV and the role of religious authorities or people/institutions who speak on behalf of Islam in Indonesia to address the issue. This article discusses the contestation between the conservative and female ulama (religious scholars), their rejection and acceptance responses, as well as demands that the decree be revised. Additionally, it discusses how female ulama have responded to the decree. Female ulama are challenging both the liberal label and stigma and the victimization approach that has led to the acceptance of sexual violence crimes. Applying a virtual ethnography, this article examines current newspaper articles and reports and social media statuses and comments which discuss the decree and cases of CSV in the period between November to December 2021. It argues that female ulama have become a new source of religious authority to challenge and contest male bias in religious interpretation on the prevention and handling of CSV.
期刊介绍:
Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.