PRBC: A practical redactable blockchain incorporating chameleon hash functions with attribute control

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xiangyu Wu , Xuehui Du , Shihao Wang , Qiantao Yang , Aodi Liu , Wenjuan Wang
{"title":"PRBC: A practical redactable blockchain incorporating chameleon hash functions with attribute control","authors":"Xiangyu Wu ,&nbsp;Xuehui Du ,&nbsp;Shihao Wang ,&nbsp;Qiantao Yang ,&nbsp;Aodi Liu ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The introduction of a redactable blockchain overcomes the challenges posed by immutability, including the inability to correct erroneous data, delete private information, and regulate illegal content. In recent years, to achieve fine-grained control over the redaction permissions of transaction data, policy-based chameleon hash (PCH) functions and their various variants have been proposed and integrated into traditional blockchains to support transaction-level redacting. However, these solutions face the problem of permission abuse, where authorized users may transfer their permissions to unauthorized individuals driven by self-interest, leading to a loss of control over permissions. Additionally, the modifiability of block data results in the potential existence of multiple legitimate block versions at the same height, making it difficult for off-chain validators to verify the timeliness of blocks solely based on block height and timestamps. To address these issues, this paper introduces attribute-based policies and identity tracing mechanisms into the chameleon hash function, proposing a practical redactable blockchain called PRBC, with the formal definitions and security models. By employing several simple cryptographic tools, such as chameleon hash functions, threshold signatures, and identity lists, fine-grained control over redaction permissions, tracking of malicious user identities, and effective validation of block timeliness are achieved, along with a complete construction and rigorous security proof of the scheme. Finally, the prototype of PRBC is constructed on the Tendermint blockchain and compared with the state-of-the-art solutions. The comprehensive evaluation indicates that the solution presented in this paper offers superior performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 104045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212625000821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of a redactable blockchain overcomes the challenges posed by immutability, including the inability to correct erroneous data, delete private information, and regulate illegal content. In recent years, to achieve fine-grained control over the redaction permissions of transaction data, policy-based chameleon hash (PCH) functions and their various variants have been proposed and integrated into traditional blockchains to support transaction-level redacting. However, these solutions face the problem of permission abuse, where authorized users may transfer their permissions to unauthorized individuals driven by self-interest, leading to a loss of control over permissions. Additionally, the modifiability of block data results in the potential existence of multiple legitimate block versions at the same height, making it difficult for off-chain validators to verify the timeliness of blocks solely based on block height and timestamps. To address these issues, this paper introduces attribute-based policies and identity tracing mechanisms into the chameleon hash function, proposing a practical redactable blockchain called PRBC, with the formal definitions and security models. By employing several simple cryptographic tools, such as chameleon hash functions, threshold signatures, and identity lists, fine-grained control over redaction permissions, tracking of malicious user identities, and effective validation of block timeliness are achieved, along with a complete construction and rigorous security proof of the scheme. Finally, the prototype of PRBC is constructed on the Tendermint blockchain and compared with the state-of-the-art solutions. The comprehensive evaluation indicates that the solution presented in this paper offers superior performance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Security and Applications
Journal of Information Security and Applications Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
206
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Information Security and Applications (JISA) focuses on the original research and practice-driven applications with relevance to information security and applications. JISA provides a common linkage between a vibrant scientific and research community and industry professionals by offering a clear view on modern problems and challenges in information security, as well as identifying promising scientific and "best-practice" solutions. JISA issues offer a balance between original research work and innovative industrial approaches by internationally renowned information security experts and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信