Mouna Y. Harb , Stephen D. Sanborn , Andrew J. Thake , Kimberley B. McAuley
{"title":"Improved gain conditioning for linear model predictive control","authors":"Mouna Y. Harb , Stephen D. Sanborn , Andrew J. Thake , Kimberley B. McAuley","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2025.103413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Industrial practitioners who develop linear model predictive control (MPC) applications want to prevent undesirable controller behaviour caused by ill-conditioned gain matrices and model mismatch. In this work, we propose improvements to an existing orthogonalization-based method for gain conditioning. In this offline algorithm, manipulated variables (MVs) are ranked based on their influences on the controlled variables (CVs), so that problematic MVs with correlated effects can be identified. A constrained linear least-squares optimization problem is then solved to adjust columns in the gain matrix that correspond to problematic MVs. Our goal is to update this optimization problem to prevent the optimizer from switching the signs of some gains. The updated algorithm also permits control practitioners to hold key gains constant if their estimated values are trusted. Finally, we extend the methodology to condition gain submatrices, which arise when CVs are removed from the MPC problem. An industrial fluidized catalytic cracking case study is used to test the proposed method. The conditioned gains lead to improved controller performance and less aggressive movement of MVs when there is a plant-model mismatch.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Process Control","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 103413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Process Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152425000411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Industrial practitioners who develop linear model predictive control (MPC) applications want to prevent undesirable controller behaviour caused by ill-conditioned gain matrices and model mismatch. In this work, we propose improvements to an existing orthogonalization-based method for gain conditioning. In this offline algorithm, manipulated variables (MVs) are ranked based on their influences on the controlled variables (CVs), so that problematic MVs with correlated effects can be identified. A constrained linear least-squares optimization problem is then solved to adjust columns in the gain matrix that correspond to problematic MVs. Our goal is to update this optimization problem to prevent the optimizer from switching the signs of some gains. The updated algorithm also permits control practitioners to hold key gains constant if their estimated values are trusted. Finally, we extend the methodology to condition gain submatrices, which arise when CVs are removed from the MPC problem. An industrial fluidized catalytic cracking case study is used to test the proposed method. The conditioned gains lead to improved controller performance and less aggressive movement of MVs when there is a plant-model mismatch.
期刊介绍:
This international journal covers the application of control theory, operations research, computer science and engineering principles to the solution of process control problems. In addition to the traditional chemical processing and manufacturing applications, the scope of process control problems involves a wide range of applications that includes energy processes, nano-technology, systems biology, bio-medical engineering, pharmaceutical processing technology, energy storage and conversion, smart grid, and data analytics among others.
Papers on the theory in these areas will also be accepted provided the theoretical contribution is aimed at the application and the development of process control techniques.
Topics covered include:
• Control applications• Process monitoring• Plant-wide control• Process control systems• Control techniques and algorithms• Process modelling and simulation• Design methods
Advanced design methods exclude well established and widely studied traditional design techniques such as PID tuning and its many variants. Applications in fields such as control of automotive engines, machinery and robotics are not deemed suitable unless a clear motivation for the relevance to process control is provided.