Comparative numerical analysis of anti-liquefaction in sandy soil reinforced with OSC and GESC under sinusoidal loading

IF 4.7 1区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL

Geotextiles and Geomembranes Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.03.007

Xiaocong Cai , Ling Zhang , Zijian Yang , Binbing Mao

{"title":"Comparative numerical analysis of anti-liquefaction in sandy soil reinforced with OSC and GESC under sinusoidal loading","authors":"Xiaocong Cai , Ling Zhang , Zijian Yang , Binbing Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Three-dimensional numerical models are developed to investigate the anti-liquefaction of ordinary (OSCs) and geosynthetic-encased (GESCs) stone columns in sandy soil under sinusoidal loading using the fluid-solid coupling method. The validated models capture and compare the vertical and radial deformation, excess pore water pressure (EPWP), and vertical effective stress of OSC, GESC, and sandy soil. Furthermore, ten essential factors are selected to conduct the parametric study. Numerical results reveal that GESC is more suitable for improving sandy soil and resisting dynamic load considering the deformation and EPWP. The bulging deformation is no longer the primary reason for failure. The partial encasement (e.g., 1-2<em>D</em>, <em>D</em> = column diameter) and short floating and end-bearing GESCs (e.g., 1-2.5<em>D</em>) are not recommended for reinforcing the sandy soil. GESC is more sensitive to low-frequency and high-amplitude loads, with shear and bending, whereas displays a block movement under higher frequency and lower amplitude loading. The change in loading amplitude is more disadvantageous to GESC than loading frequency. GESC with a large diameter cannot effectively resist the dynamic loads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 950-973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000378","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three-dimensional numerical models are developed to investigate the anti-liquefaction of ordinary (OSCs) and geosynthetic-encased (GESCs) stone columns in sandy soil under sinusoidal loading using the fluid-solid coupling method. The validated models capture and compare the vertical and radial deformation, excess pore water pressure (EPWP), and vertical effective stress of OSC, GESC, and sandy soil. Furthermore, ten essential factors are selected to conduct the parametric study. Numerical results reveal that GESC is more suitable for improving sandy soil and resisting dynamic load considering the deformation and EPWP. The bulging deformation is no longer the primary reason for failure. The partial encasement (e.g., 1-2D, D = column diameter) and short floating and end-bearing GESCs (e.g., 1-2.5D) are not recommended for reinforcing the sandy soil. GESC is more sensitive to low-frequency and high-amplitude loads, with shear and bending, whereas displays a block movement under higher frequency and lower amplitude loading. The change in loading amplitude is more disadvantageous to GESC than loading frequency. GESC with a large diameter cannot effectively resist the dynamic loads.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合

CiteScore

9.50

自引率

21.20%

发文量

111

审稿时长

59 days

期刊介绍： The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.