Risk-sensitive optimization of neural deep learning ranking models with applications in ad-hoc retrieval and recommender systems

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Pedro Henrique Silva Rodrigues , Daniel Xavier de Sousa , Celso França , Gestefane Rabbi , Thierson Couto Rosa , Marcos André Gonçalves
{"title":"Risk-sensitive optimization of neural deep learning ranking models with applications in ad-hoc retrieval and recommender systems","authors":"Pedro Henrique Silva Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Daniel Xavier de Sousa ,&nbsp;Celso França ,&nbsp;Gestefane Rabbi ,&nbsp;Thierson Couto Rosa ,&nbsp;Marcos André Gonçalves","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We answer open research questions regarding the (hard) problem of incorporating risk-sensitiveness measures into Deep Neural Networks for ranking models of retrieval and recommender systems. Risk-sensitive measures are important for controlling the bias towards the average when optimizing ranking solutions’ effectiveness. In previous work, we proposed the <em>RiskLoss</em> function which presents two important adaptations for neural network ranking in ad-hoc retrieval: a differentiable loss function and the use of networks’ sub-portions, obtained via dropout, as baseline systems for optimizing risk sensitiveness. However, questions remained to be answered regarding the generality, cost, and applicability of our solution. In this article, we respond to these questions by (i) applying <em>RiskLoss</em> to ranking in recommender systems, (ii) analyzing the execution cost of <em>RiskLoss</em> and (iii) providing an experimental evaluation of <em>RiskLoss</em>’ resilience to overfitting. Our experiments, comparing seven loss functions on three benchmark recommendation datasets (AIV, ML35M, ML25M, ML100K and ML1M) and four Learning To Rank datasets (WEB30K, WEB10K, YAHOO and MQ2007), with thousands to millions of interactions, reveal that <em>RiskLoss</em> presents the most consistent risk sensitiveness behavior, with gains up to 4.5% in GeoRisk@10 without significant losses in effectiveness. In particular, <em>RiskLoss</em> can reduce the number of bad recommendations by over 11% for “hard to recommend” users. We also show that <em>RiskLoss</em> is not much affected by overfitting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 4","pages":"Article 104126"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325000688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We answer open research questions regarding the (hard) problem of incorporating risk-sensitiveness measures into Deep Neural Networks for ranking models of retrieval and recommender systems. Risk-sensitive measures are important for controlling the bias towards the average when optimizing ranking solutions’ effectiveness. In previous work, we proposed the RiskLoss function which presents two important adaptations for neural network ranking in ad-hoc retrieval: a differentiable loss function and the use of networks’ sub-portions, obtained via dropout, as baseline systems for optimizing risk sensitiveness. However, questions remained to be answered regarding the generality, cost, and applicability of our solution. In this article, we respond to these questions by (i) applying RiskLoss to ranking in recommender systems, (ii) analyzing the execution cost of RiskLoss and (iii) providing an experimental evaluation of RiskLoss’ resilience to overfitting. Our experiments, comparing seven loss functions on three benchmark recommendation datasets (AIV, ML35M, ML25M, ML100K and ML1M) and four Learning To Rank datasets (WEB30K, WEB10K, YAHOO and MQ2007), with thousands to millions of interactions, reveal that RiskLoss presents the most consistent risk sensitiveness behavior, with gains up to 4.5% in GeoRisk@10 without significant losses in effectiveness. In particular, RiskLoss can reduce the number of bad recommendations by over 11% for “hard to recommend” users. We also show that RiskLoss is not much affected by overfitting.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信