Experiences of the female nursing higher education workforce: a systematic integrative review.

Jo Divers
{"title":"Experiences of the female nursing higher education workforce: a systematic integrative review.","authors":"Jo Divers","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nursing and midwifery are female-dominated professions, both in clinical practice and in higher education, men are disproportionately represented in leadership and senior positions. The objectives of this review are to explore the lived experiences of the female nursing and midwifery higher education workforce to better understand barriers to progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of nine databases from both health and education arenas identified relevant literature; this was appraised and thematically analysed using a structured approach.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Only seven articles were retrieved, revealing female nursing academics' experiences relating to juggling multiple roles, the competitive culture of academia, lived experiences of benevolent sexism, and the importance of early career mentoring and female role models. The importance of the female voice and role models for students and the influence of this on the future workforce was also highlighted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited literature available examining women's experiences as nursing educators (and none could be retrieved that related to midwifery). Findings corroborate female experiences from other industry sectors, particularly in relation to juggling roles and caring responsibilities impeding career progression. Benevolent sexism arose as a significant barrier to leadership within nursing education as the caring role is perceived as highly feminised.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 6","pages":"326-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although nursing and midwifery are female-dominated professions, both in clinical practice and in higher education, men are disproportionately represented in leadership and senior positions. The objectives of this review are to explore the lived experiences of the female nursing and midwifery higher education workforce to better understand barriers to progression.

Methods: A systematic search of nine databases from both health and education arenas identified relevant literature; this was appraised and thematically analysed using a structured approach.

Findings: Only seven articles were retrieved, revealing female nursing academics' experiences relating to juggling multiple roles, the competitive culture of academia, lived experiences of benevolent sexism, and the importance of early career mentoring and female role models. The importance of the female voice and role models for students and the influence of this on the future workforce was also highlighted.

Conclusion: There is limited literature available examining women's experiences as nursing educators (and none could be retrieved that related to midwifery). Findings corroborate female experiences from other industry sectors, particularly in relation to juggling roles and caring responsibilities impeding career progression. Benevolent sexism arose as a significant barrier to leadership within nursing education as the caring role is perceived as highly feminised.

女性护理高等教育劳动力的经验:一个系统的综合评价。
背景:尽管护理和助产在临床实践和高等教育中都是女性主导的职业,但男性在领导和高级职位上的比例不成比例。本综述的目的是探讨女性护理和助产高等教育劳动力的生活经历,以更好地了解发展的障碍。方法:系统检索来自卫生和教育领域的9个数据库,确定相关文献;使用结构化方法对其进行了评估和主题分析。结果:仅检索到7篇文章,揭示了女性护理学者在兼顾多重角色、学术竞争文化、善意性别歧视的生活经历以及早期职业指导和女性榜样的重要性等方面的经历。与会者还强调了女性声音和榜样对学生的重要性及其对未来劳动力的影响。结论:研究女性作为护理教育者的经验的文献有限(没有一个可以检索到与助产有关的文献)。调查结果证实了其他行业女性的经验,特别是在平衡角色和照顾责任阻碍职业发展方面。仁慈的性别歧视在护理教育中成为领导的重大障碍,因为护理角色被认为是高度女性化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信