The Integration of Social and Health Sectors in Scotland: An Analysis from the Prism of Different Public Policy Models.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp13010008
Ricardo Correia de Matos, Generosa do Nascimento, Adalberto Campos Fernandes, Cristiano Matos
{"title":"The Integration of Social and Health Sectors in Scotland: An Analysis from the Prism of Different Public Policy Models.","authors":"Ricardo Correia de Matos, Generosa do Nascimento, Adalberto Campos Fernandes, Cristiano Matos","doi":"10.3390/jmahp13010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of health and social care has been a key focus in Scotland, driven by demographic changes, rising healthcare costs, and the need for more efficient service delivery. The Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 sought to formalise this integration by restructuring governance and service provision to improve coordination between health and social care sectors. Despite these efforts, challenges remain in fully achieving the intended outcomes of the integration. This study analysed Scotland's integrated health and social care through the theoretical frameworks of public choice, institutionalism, and functionalism. The objective was to examine policy drivers, structural mechanisms, and governance implications, providing insights into the broader impact of integrated care reforms. A qualitative research approach was employed, synthesising data from peer-reviewed literature, government publications, and policy documents. The findings on integration were systematically examined through the lens of each public policy model, allowing for a nuanced analysis of how Scotland's approach to integration aligns with and diverges from these frameworks. A literature search was performed on PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Scottish government portals. While integration improved coordination and service delivery in some areas, limitations in funding allocation, workforce distribution, and governance autonomy limited its overall success. Scotland's integrated care model demonstrates potential benefits in reducing service fragmentation and improving patient-centred care; however, persistent challenges such as funding constraints, workforce shortages, and governance conflicts indicate that integration alone is not sufficient to resolve systemic healthcare inefficiencies. This study provides a perspective on Scotland's health and social care integration, offering valuable lessons for other European countries facing similar demographic and healthcare challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"13 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp13010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of health and social care has been a key focus in Scotland, driven by demographic changes, rising healthcare costs, and the need for more efficient service delivery. The Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 sought to formalise this integration by restructuring governance and service provision to improve coordination between health and social care sectors. Despite these efforts, challenges remain in fully achieving the intended outcomes of the integration. This study analysed Scotland's integrated health and social care through the theoretical frameworks of public choice, institutionalism, and functionalism. The objective was to examine policy drivers, structural mechanisms, and governance implications, providing insights into the broader impact of integrated care reforms. A qualitative research approach was employed, synthesising data from peer-reviewed literature, government publications, and policy documents. The findings on integration were systematically examined through the lens of each public policy model, allowing for a nuanced analysis of how Scotland's approach to integration aligns with and diverges from these frameworks. A literature search was performed on PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Scottish government portals. While integration improved coordination and service delivery in some areas, limitations in funding allocation, workforce distribution, and governance autonomy limited its overall success. Scotland's integrated care model demonstrates potential benefits in reducing service fragmentation and improving patient-centred care; however, persistent challenges such as funding constraints, workforce shortages, and governance conflicts indicate that integration alone is not sufficient to resolve systemic healthcare inefficiencies. This study provides a perspective on Scotland's health and social care integration, offering valuable lessons for other European countries facing similar demographic and healthcare challenges.

苏格兰社会和卫生部门的整合:从不同公共政策模式的棱镜分析。
在人口变化、医疗保健费用上升以及需要更有效地提供服务的推动下,保健和社会保健一体化一直是苏格兰的一个重点。《2014年公共机构(联合工作)(苏格兰)法》试图通过重组治理和服务提供,以改善卫生和社会保健部门之间的协调,使这种整合正式化。尽管作出了这些努力,但在充分实现一体化的预期成果方面仍然存在挑战。本研究通过公共选择、制度主义和功能主义的理论框架分析了苏格兰的综合卫生和社会保健。目的是研究政策驱动因素、结构机制和治理影响,为综合护理改革的广泛影响提供见解。采用了定性研究方法,综合了来自同行评审文献、政府出版物和政策文件的数据。通过每个公共政策模型的镜头系统地检查了关于整合的发现,允许对苏格兰的整合方法如何与这些框架保持一致和偏离进行细致入微的分析。在PUBMED、b谷歌Scholar和苏格兰政府门户网站上进行了文献检索。虽然集成改善了某些领域的协调和服务交付,但资金分配、劳动力分配和治理自主权方面的限制限制了其总体成功。苏格兰的综合护理模式在减少服务分散和改善以病人为中心的护理方面显示出潜在的好处;然而,资金限制、劳动力短缺和治理冲突等持续存在的挑战表明,仅靠整合不足以解决系统性医疗保健效率低下的问题。这项研究为苏格兰的健康和社会保健一体化提供了一个视角,为其他面临类似人口和保健挑战的欧洲国家提供了宝贵的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信