From triage to departure: Older adults' ED journey. A mixed methods study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Melinda Williamson, Kristie J Harper, Sarah Bernard, Courtenay Harris
{"title":"From triage to departure: Older adults' ED journey. A mixed methods study.","authors":"Melinda Williamson, Kristie J Harper, Sarah Bernard, Courtenay Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising Emergency Department (ED) demand strains resources to assess and manage frail older adults. Allied health supports comprehensive care, disposition planning and patient safety in the ED but often intervenes late. This study investigated factors affecting allied health referrals and co-designed an early allied health frailty service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. Patient journey mapping of low acuity older ED patients was followed by stakeholder focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From triage, 20 older ED patients waited a mean of 110 minutes (SD 83 minutes) for doctor assessment, 123 minutes (SD 116 minutes) for an ED bed and 355 minutes (SD 297 minutes) for allied health assessment with a mean ED length of stay (LOS) of 685 minutes (SD 444 minutes). Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions identified perceived benefits of an early allied health service including shorter LOS, earlier disposition planning, increased staff confidence and streamlined decision making. Perceived barriers were lack of space, competing assessments with doctors and incomplete investigations. Perceived solutions were refining the inclusion criteria and staff education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allied health assessment occurred six hours post presentation, outside national targets. Opportunities and barriers identified supported the development of an earlier allied health frailty service.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rising Emergency Department (ED) demand strains resources to assess and manage frail older adults. Allied health supports comprehensive care, disposition planning and patient safety in the ED but often intervenes late. This study investigated factors affecting allied health referrals and co-designed an early allied health frailty service.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. Patient journey mapping of low acuity older ED patients was followed by stakeholder focus groups.

Results: From triage, 20 older ED patients waited a mean of 110 minutes (SD 83 minutes) for doctor assessment, 123 minutes (SD 116 minutes) for an ED bed and 355 minutes (SD 297 minutes) for allied health assessment with a mean ED length of stay (LOS) of 685 minutes (SD 444 minutes). Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions identified perceived benefits of an early allied health service including shorter LOS, earlier disposition planning, increased staff confidence and streamlined decision making. Perceived barriers were lack of space, competing assessments with doctors and incomplete investigations. Perceived solutions were refining the inclusion criteria and staff education.

Conclusion: Allied health assessment occurred six hours post presentation, outside national targets. Opportunities and barriers identified supported the development of an earlier allied health frailty service.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信