Melinda Williamson, Kristie J Harper, Sarah Bernard, Courtenay Harris
{"title":"From triage to departure: Older adults' ED journey. A mixed methods study.","authors":"Melinda Williamson, Kristie J Harper, Sarah Bernard, Courtenay Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising Emergency Department (ED) demand strains resources to assess and manage frail older adults. Allied health supports comprehensive care, disposition planning and patient safety in the ED but often intervenes late. This study investigated factors affecting allied health referrals and co-designed an early allied health frailty service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. Patient journey mapping of low acuity older ED patients was followed by stakeholder focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From triage, 20 older ED patients waited a mean of 110 minutes (SD 83 minutes) for doctor assessment, 123 minutes (SD 116 minutes) for an ED bed and 355 minutes (SD 297 minutes) for allied health assessment with a mean ED length of stay (LOS) of 685 minutes (SD 444 minutes). Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions identified perceived benefits of an early allied health service including shorter LOS, earlier disposition planning, increased staff confidence and streamlined decision making. Perceived barriers were lack of space, competing assessments with doctors and incomplete investigations. Perceived solutions were refining the inclusion criteria and staff education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allied health assessment occurred six hours post presentation, outside national targets. Opportunities and barriers identified supported the development of an earlier allied health frailty service.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Rising Emergency Department (ED) demand strains resources to assess and manage frail older adults. Allied health supports comprehensive care, disposition planning and patient safety in the ED but often intervenes late. This study investigated factors affecting allied health referrals and co-designed an early allied health frailty service.
Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. Patient journey mapping of low acuity older ED patients was followed by stakeholder focus groups.
Results: From triage, 20 older ED patients waited a mean of 110 minutes (SD 83 minutes) for doctor assessment, 123 minutes (SD 116 minutes) for an ED bed and 355 minutes (SD 297 minutes) for allied health assessment with a mean ED length of stay (LOS) of 685 minutes (SD 444 minutes). Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions identified perceived benefits of an early allied health service including shorter LOS, earlier disposition planning, increased staff confidence and streamlined decision making. Perceived barriers were lack of space, competing assessments with doctors and incomplete investigations. Perceived solutions were refining the inclusion criteria and staff education.
Conclusion: Allied health assessment occurred six hours post presentation, outside national targets. Opportunities and barriers identified supported the development of an earlier allied health frailty service.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.