Establishing a Platform Method for Physical Appearance Assessment of New Parenteral Pharmaceuticals.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ying Wan, Walter Wasylaschuk, Joseph Straub, Wei Xu, Nicole Lepo, Patricia M Egan, Jillian Acevedo-Skrip, Elizabeth Thoryk, Megan Mackey
{"title":"Establishing a Platform Method for Physical Appearance Assessment of New Parenteral Pharmaceuticals.","authors":"Ying Wan, Walter Wasylaschuk, Joseph Straub, Wei Xu, Nicole Lepo, Patricia M Egan, Jillian Acevedo-Skrip, Elizabeth Thoryk, Megan Mackey","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01049-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical appearance (PA) is an attribute indicating the quality of parenteral pharmaceuticals. It is routinely evaluated during release and stability testing and included in regulatory filings. PA assessment of liquids involves three tests: visible particulates, clarity, and color. For each test, compendial general method chapters are available requiring minimal modification. This allows for a platform PA method approach, streamlining method readiness for new test articles. However, selecting the appropriate method is challenging, as no method suits all test articles, and pharmacopeias do not specify suitable condition(s) for each method. Improper method selection can lead to inappropriate specification setting and unreliable results. The need for guidance is especially urgent for vaccines, which often exhibit a wide range of PA attributes due to complex delivery systems and adjuvants that boost immunogenicity. This manuscript addresses this challenge by explaining method suitability and presenting a decision table for PA method selection based on the appearance properties of pharmaceuticals. A case study involving a yellow-turbid vaccine adjuvant is presented to demonstrate the practical application of the decision table. When color and turbidity make visual comparison to reference liquids difficult, instrumental clarity and visual qualitative methods are suitable options. The manuscript provides valuable insights on PA method selection and setting specifications for new parenteral pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the decision table enables platform methods for test articles sharing similar appearance properties, eliminating the need for individual methods, reducing document preparation time for method and verification protocol, and enhancing the consistency and efficiency of GMP testing for PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 3","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01049-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical appearance (PA) is an attribute indicating the quality of parenteral pharmaceuticals. It is routinely evaluated during release and stability testing and included in regulatory filings. PA assessment of liquids involves three tests: visible particulates, clarity, and color. For each test, compendial general method chapters are available requiring minimal modification. This allows for a platform PA method approach, streamlining method readiness for new test articles. However, selecting the appropriate method is challenging, as no method suits all test articles, and pharmacopeias do not specify suitable condition(s) for each method. Improper method selection can lead to inappropriate specification setting and unreliable results. The need for guidance is especially urgent for vaccines, which often exhibit a wide range of PA attributes due to complex delivery systems and adjuvants that boost immunogenicity. This manuscript addresses this challenge by explaining method suitability and presenting a decision table for PA method selection based on the appearance properties of pharmaceuticals. A case study involving a yellow-turbid vaccine adjuvant is presented to demonstrate the practical application of the decision table. When color and turbidity make visual comparison to reference liquids difficult, instrumental clarity and visual qualitative methods are suitable options. The manuscript provides valuable insights on PA method selection and setting specifications for new parenteral pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the decision table enables platform methods for test articles sharing similar appearance properties, eliminating the need for individual methods, reducing document preparation time for method and verification protocol, and enhancing the consistency and efficiency of GMP testing for PA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信