Ping Wang, Jianing Cui, Haoyuan Du, Zhanhua Qian, Huili Zhan, Heng Zhang, Wei Ye, Wei Meng, Rongjie Bai
{"title":"Preoperative Prediction of STAS Risk in Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Machine Learning: An Interpretable Model with SHAP Analysis.","authors":"Ping Wang, Jianing Cui, Haoyuan Du, Zhanhua Qian, Huili Zhan, Heng Zhang, Wei Ye, Wei Meng, Rongjie Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces (STAS) in primary lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is critical for optimizing surgical strategies and improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a machine learning (ML) based model to predict STAS using preoperative CT imaging features and clinicopathological data, while enhancing interpretability through shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 1237 patients with pathologically confirmed primary LUAD from three hospitals. Patients from Center 1 (n=932) were divided into a training set (n=652) and an internal test set (n=280). Patients from Centers 2 (n=165) and 3 (n=140) formed external validation sets. CT imaging features and clinical variables were selected using Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Seven ML models were developed and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using F1 score, recall, precision, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model achieved AUCs of 0.973 (training set), 0.862 (internal test set), and 0.842/0.810 (external validation sets). SHAP analysis identified nodule type, carcinoembryonic antigen, maximum nodule diameter, and lobulated sign as key features for predicting STAS. Logistic regression analysis confirmed these as independent risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGB model demonstrated high predictive accuracy and interpretability for STAS. By integrating widely available clinical and imaging features, this model offers a practical and effective tool for preoperative risk stratification, supporting personalized surgical planning in primary LUAD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Accurate preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces (STAS) in primary lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is critical for optimizing surgical strategies and improving patient outcomes.
Objective: To develop a machine learning (ML) based model to predict STAS using preoperative CT imaging features and clinicopathological data, while enhancing interpretability through shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis.
Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 1237 patients with pathologically confirmed primary LUAD from three hospitals. Patients from Center 1 (n=932) were divided into a training set (n=652) and an internal test set (n=280). Patients from Centers 2 (n=165) and 3 (n=140) formed external validation sets. CT imaging features and clinical variables were selected using Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Seven ML models were developed and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using F1 score, recall, precision, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model achieved AUCs of 0.973 (training set), 0.862 (internal test set), and 0.842/0.810 (external validation sets). SHAP analysis identified nodule type, carcinoembryonic antigen, maximum nodule diameter, and lobulated sign as key features for predicting STAS. Logistic regression analysis confirmed these as independent risk factors.
Conclusion: The XGB model demonstrated high predictive accuracy and interpretability for STAS. By integrating widely available clinical and imaging features, this model offers a practical and effective tool for preoperative risk stratification, supporting personalized surgical planning in primary LUAD management.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.