Clinical Outcomes for Heart-Alone and Multiorgan Transplant Under the New Heart Allocation Policy Era.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036687
Keshvi Chauhan, Timothy Hess, Didier Mandelbrot, Takushi Kohmoto, Ravi Dhingra
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes for Heart-Alone and Multiorgan Transplant Under the New Heart Allocation Policy Era.","authors":"Keshvi Chauhan, Timothy Hess, Didier Mandelbrot, Takushi Kohmoto, Ravi Dhingra","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In October 2018, a new heart transplant allocation policy was implemented in the United States to address inequalities. Under the new policy, some patient outcomes for patients with heart transplant have improved; however, outcomes of multiorgan transplants combined with heart remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the waitlist mortality, time to transplant, and posttransplant survival for all patients listed between 2013 and 2022 for multiorgan transplants with heart (n=3798) and compared the old policy era to the new policy era using cumulative incident curves and multivariable Cox regression models. Cumulative incidence curves also compared multiorgan transplants to patients listed for heart alone (n=31 840) under the new policy era.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients awaiting multiorgan transplants had higher use of intra-aortic balloon pumps (4.7% versus 11%) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (2.4% versus 4.9%) in the new policy era. Under the new policy, despite receiving transplants sooner (n=2200 transplants, hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% CI, 1.59-1.91]), patients who received multiorgan transplants had no change in waitlist mortality (n=340 deaths, HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.84-1.34]) compared with the old policy era. The rate of death post-multiorgan transplant was significantly higher in incidence curves under the new policy compared with the old policy era (log-rank <i>P</i>=0.02). However, in multivariable Cox models, the risk of death post-multiorgan transplant was similar under the new policy (n=287 deaths, HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.87-1.41]) compared with the old policy era.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the new policy, waitlist deaths have decreased for patients awaiting heart alone, but not for those awaiting multiorgan transplants. Post-transplant survival remains lower for patients who underwent multiorgan transplant (compared with heart-alone transplant), with no change under the new policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036687"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In October 2018, a new heart transplant allocation policy was implemented in the United States to address inequalities. Under the new policy, some patient outcomes for patients with heart transplant have improved; however, outcomes of multiorgan transplants combined with heart remain unclear.

Methods: We examined the waitlist mortality, time to transplant, and posttransplant survival for all patients listed between 2013 and 2022 for multiorgan transplants with heart (n=3798) and compared the old policy era to the new policy era using cumulative incident curves and multivariable Cox regression models. Cumulative incidence curves also compared multiorgan transplants to patients listed for heart alone (n=31 840) under the new policy era.

Results: Patients awaiting multiorgan transplants had higher use of intra-aortic balloon pumps (4.7% versus 11%) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (2.4% versus 4.9%) in the new policy era. Under the new policy, despite receiving transplants sooner (n=2200 transplants, hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% CI, 1.59-1.91]), patients who received multiorgan transplants had no change in waitlist mortality (n=340 deaths, HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.84-1.34]) compared with the old policy era. The rate of death post-multiorgan transplant was significantly higher in incidence curves under the new policy compared with the old policy era (log-rank P=0.02). However, in multivariable Cox models, the risk of death post-multiorgan transplant was similar under the new policy (n=287 deaths, HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.87-1.41]) compared with the old policy era.

Conclusions: Under the new policy, waitlist deaths have decreased for patients awaiting heart alone, but not for those awaiting multiorgan transplants. Post-transplant survival remains lower for patients who underwent multiorgan transplant (compared with heart-alone transplant), with no change under the new policy.

新心脏分配政策时代下单心与多器官移植的临床效果
背景:2018年10月,美国实施了一项新的心脏移植分配政策,以解决不平等问题。在新政策下,一些心脏移植患者的预后有所改善;然而,多器官联合心脏移植的结果尚不清楚。方法:我们检查了2013年至2022年间所有心脏多器官移植患者(n=3798)的等待名单死亡率、移植时间和移植后生存率,并使用累积事件曲线和多变量Cox回归模型比较了旧政策时代和新政策时代。累积发生率曲线也比较了新政策下多器官移植与单纯心脏患者(n=31 840)。结果:在新政策时代,等待多器官移植的患者使用主动脉内球囊泵(4.7%比11%)和体外膜氧合支持(2.4%比4.9%)的比例更高。在新政策下,尽管接受移植的时间更早(n=2200例移植,风险比[HR], 1.74 [95% CI, 1.59-1.91]),但与旧政策时代相比,接受多器官移植的患者的等待名单死亡率没有变化(n=340例死亡,HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.84-1.34])。新政策下多器官移植术后死亡率在发病率曲线上明显高于旧政策时期(log-rank P=0.02)。然而,在多变量Cox模型中,与旧政策时代相比,新政策下多器官移植后死亡风险相似(n=287例死亡,HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.87-1.41])。结论:在新政策下,等待心脏移植的患者死亡人数有所下降,但等待多器官移植的患者死亡人数没有下降。接受多器官移植的患者的移植后生存率仍然较低(与单独心脏移植相比),在新政策下没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信