Engagement in Digital Self-management Interventions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
R Ross MacLean, Rachel Shor, Erin D Reilly, Lillian Reuman, Chelsey Solar, Allison M Halat, Diana M Higgins
{"title":"Engagement in Digital Self-management Interventions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.","authors":"R Ross MacLean, Rachel Shor, Erin D Reilly, Lillian Reuman, Chelsey Solar, Allison M Halat, Diana M Higgins","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital interventions promise to increase access to non-pharmacological chronic pain treatment and reduce burden for both individuals seeking care and pain providers/clinics. Unfortunately, despite early evidence of efficacy, engagement in self-management digital interventions for chronic conditions is typically low. A comprehensive analysis into how engagement in these programs is measured and reported is warranted. The current systematic review evaluated engagement in digital self-management interventions for chronic pain and identified gaps to improve reporting of engagement data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pre-registered systematic review using Boolean search terms to identify digital chronic pain self-management interventions that did not include clinician support. After removal of duplicates and screening, 148 full-text manuscripts were assessed, and 44 studies met inclusion criteria. Data was extracted and examined from included manuscripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 44 included articles, five articles were based on two separate datasets, resulting in a final sample of 40 unique datasets representing 4,178 participants that were mostly non-Hispanic White, female, and with at least some college education. Approximately 10% of studies did not report any data related to system use or self-reported engagement. Most engagement data consisted of mean system use variables, with a handful of studies describing self-reported use of skills and very few studies examining demographic variables associated with engagement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To address identified gaps in the reviewed literature, we suggest guidelines for collecting and reporting engagement in digital chronic pain interventions. Consistent reporting of engagement data will improve evaluation, efficacy, and improvement of interventions designed to assist individuals who may otherwise not receive non-pharmacological pain treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Digital interventions promise to increase access to non-pharmacological chronic pain treatment and reduce burden for both individuals seeking care and pain providers/clinics. Unfortunately, despite early evidence of efficacy, engagement in self-management digital interventions for chronic conditions is typically low. A comprehensive analysis into how engagement in these programs is measured and reported is warranted. The current systematic review evaluated engagement in digital self-management interventions for chronic pain and identified gaps to improve reporting of engagement data.

Methods: We conducted a pre-registered systematic review using Boolean search terms to identify digital chronic pain self-management interventions that did not include clinician support. After removal of duplicates and screening, 148 full-text manuscripts were assessed, and 44 studies met inclusion criteria. Data was extracted and examined from included manuscripts.

Results: Of the 44 included articles, five articles were based on two separate datasets, resulting in a final sample of 40 unique datasets representing 4,178 participants that were mostly non-Hispanic White, female, and with at least some college education. Approximately 10% of studies did not report any data related to system use or self-reported engagement. Most engagement data consisted of mean system use variables, with a handful of studies describing self-reported use of skills and very few studies examining demographic variables associated with engagement.

Discussion: To address identified gaps in the reviewed literature, we suggest guidelines for collecting and reporting engagement in digital chronic pain interventions. Consistent reporting of engagement data will improve evaluation, efficacy, and improvement of interventions designed to assist individuals who may otherwise not receive non-pharmacological pain treatment.

参与数字化自我管理干预慢性疼痛:系统综述。
目标:数字干预有望增加非药物慢性疼痛治疗的可及性,并减轻寻求护理的个人和疼痛提供者/诊所的负担。不幸的是,尽管有早期疗效的证据,但对慢性病的自我管理数字干预的参与度通常很低。有必要对如何衡量和报告这些项目的参与情况进行全面分析。目前的系统回顾评估了对慢性疼痛的数字化自我管理干预措施的参与情况,并确定了改善参与数据报告的差距。方法:我们使用布尔搜索词进行了一项预注册的系统评价,以识别不包括临床医生支持的数字慢性疼痛自我管理干预措施。在删除重复和筛选后,148篇全文手稿被评估,44篇研究符合纳入标准。从纳入的手稿中提取和检查数据。结果:在纳入的44篇文章中,有5篇文章基于两个独立的数据集,最终的样本包含40个独特的数据集,代表了4178名参与者,这些参与者大多是非西班牙裔白人、女性,至少受过一些大学教育。大约10%的研究没有报告任何与系统使用或自我报告参与度相关的数据。大多数用户粘性数据由平均系统使用变量组成,少数研究描述了自我报告的技能使用情况,很少有研究考察了与用户粘性相关的人口变量。讨论:为了解决文献综述中的空白,我们提出了收集和报告数字化慢性疼痛干预的指南。参与数据的一致报告将改善评估、疗效和改进干预措施,旨在帮助那些可能无法接受非药物疼痛治疗的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信