Relationships Between Changes in Forward Bending, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Self-Efficacy During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Anne Smith
{"title":"Relationships Between Changes in Forward Bending, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Self-Efficacy During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Anne Smith","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to reductions in pain catastrophizing (PC) and improvements in pain self-efficacy (PSE) in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing cognitive functional therapy (CFT). <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal observational study. <b>METHODS:</b> Two hundred sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (average of 4.3 time points per participant [range, 1-8]). Inertial measurement units placed on T12 and S2 measured spinal range of movement (ROM) and velocity. Participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire online at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate, multilevel models evaluated the associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, and lumbar ROM) as well as PC/PSE. <b>RESULTS:</b> Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced PC (r = -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.82, -0.01) and increased PSE (r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.87). There was no evidence of an association between changes in trunk ROM and PC (r = -0.06; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.28) or PSE (r = 0.36; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.65) as well as no evidence of an association between lumbar ROM and PC (r = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.63, 0.55) or PSE (r = 0.16; 95% CI: -0.49, 0.69). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Improvements in PC and PSE were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity-but not trunk or lumbar ROM-in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains \"nonprotective\" spinal movement in conjunction with positively reframing pain cognitions. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-11. Epub 12 March 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13114</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"284-294"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to reductions in pain catastrophizing (PC) and improvements in pain self-efficacy (PSE) in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing cognitive functional therapy (CFT). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (average of 4.3 time points per participant [range, 1-8]). Inertial measurement units placed on T12 and S2 measured spinal range of movement (ROM) and velocity. Participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire online at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate, multilevel models evaluated the associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, and lumbar ROM) as well as PC/PSE. RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced PC (r = -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.82, -0.01) and increased PSE (r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.87). There was no evidence of an association between changes in trunk ROM and PC (r = -0.06; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.28) or PSE (r = 0.36; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.65) as well as no evidence of an association between lumbar ROM and PC (r = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.63, 0.55) or PSE (r = 0.16; 95% CI: -0.49, 0.69). CONCLUSION: Improvements in PC and PSE were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity-but not trunk or lumbar ROM-in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains "nonprotective" spinal movement in conjunction with positively reframing pain cognitions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-11. Epub 12 March 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13114.

慢性腰痛认知功能治疗中前屈、疼痛灾难和疼痛自我效能改变的关系
目的:研究在接受认知功能治疗(CFT)的慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者中,前屈训练的改善是否与疼痛灾难化(PC)的减少和疼痛自我效能(PSE)的改善有关。设计:纵向观察研究。方法:261名CLBP患者接受CFT治疗。在13周的疗程中,每次治疗均对前屈进行评估(每位参与者平均4.3个时间点[范围,1-8])。放置在T12和S2上的惯性测量单元测量了脊柱的运动范围(ROM)和速度。参与者分别在第0、3、6和13周完成疼痛灾难化量表和疼痛自我效能问卷。多变量、多水平模型评估了3种脊柱运动测量(躯干速度、躯干ROM和腰椎ROM)以及PC/PSE的个体变化率随时间的关系。结果:树干速度的增加与PC的降低有很强的相关性(r = -0.56;95%可信区间[CI]: -0.82, -0.01)和PSE升高(r = 0.63;95% ci: 0.18, 0.87)。没有证据表明主干ROM和PC之间的变化有关联(r = -0.06;95% CI: 0.38, 0.28)或PSE (r = 0.36;95% CI: -0.27, 0.65),也没有证据表明腰椎ROM和PC之间存在关联(r = -0.07;95% CI: -0.63, 0.55)或PSE (r = 0.16;95% ci: -0.49, 0.69)。结论:在接受CFT的CLBP患者中,PC和PSE的改善与躯干速度的增加密切相关,但与躯干或腰椎rom无关。这些发现与CFT明确训练“非保护性”脊柱运动与积极重构疼痛认知相一致。[J] .体育运动学报,2015;55(4):1-11。2025年3月12日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.13114。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信