The Effect of a Surgeon Communication Strategy on Treatment Preference for Thyroid Cancer: A Randomized Trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1177/0272989X251325837
Catherine B Jensen, Brandy Sinco, Megan C Saucke, Kyle J Bushaw, Alexis G Antunez, Corrine I Voils, Susan C Pitt
{"title":"The Effect of a Surgeon Communication Strategy on Treatment Preference for Thyroid Cancer: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Catherine B Jensen, Brandy Sinco, Megan C Saucke, Kyle J Bushaw, Alexis G Antunez, Corrine I Voils, Susan C Pitt","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251325837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCancer diagnosis causes emotional distress, which can influence patients' treatment choice. This study aimed to investigate the effect of increased emotionally supportive surgeon communication in a virtual setting on treatment preference for thyroid cancer.DesignThis randomized trial (NCT05132478), conducted from November 2021 to February 2023, enrolled adults with ≤4-cm thyroid nodules not requiring surgery. Participants were randomized 1:1 to watch a virtual clinic visit depicting a patient-surgeon treatment discussion for low-risk thyroid cancer. Control and intervention videos were identical except for added emotionally supportive communication in the intervention. The primary outcome was treatment preference for total thyroidectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes were perceived physician empathy, physician trust, decisional confidence, and disease-specific knowledge. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using conditional regression to account for stratification by sex. Qualitative content analysis evaluated participants' open-ended responses about treatment choice and surgeon communication.ResultsOf 208 eligible patients, 118 (56.7%) participated. Participants were 85.6% female and 88.1% White. Overall, 89.0% (<i>n</i> = 105) of participants preferred lobectomy, which was similar between the intervention and control groups (90.0% v. 87.9%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.72). Compared with control, participants who viewed the consultation with enhanced communication perceived higher levels of physician empathy (34.5 ± 5.8 v. 25.9 ± 9.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and reported increased trust in the physician (12.0 ± 2.6 v. 10.4 ± 3.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The groups were similar in decisional confidence (7.6 ± 2.1 v. 7.7 ± 1.9, <i>P</i> = 0.74) and disease-specific knowledge. Prominent qualitative themes among participants choosing thyroid lobectomy included desire to avoid daily thyroid hormone (<i>n</i> = 53) and concerns about surgical complications (<i>n</i> = 25).ConclusionsIn this randomized controlled study, a significant proportion of participants preferred thyroid lobectomy if diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer. Participants perceived increased empathy when provided even in the virtual setting, which was associated with increased trust in the physician.HighlightsIn this single-site, randomized controlled trial, enhanced emotionally supportive surgeon communication had no effect on hypothetical treatment preference for low-risk thyroid cancer.Participants who experienced enhanced emotionally supportive surgeon communication perceived higher physician empathy and reported greater trust in the physician.The incorporation of empathetic communication during surgical consultation for low-risk thyroid cancer promotes patient trust and perception of empathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"426-436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251325837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCancer diagnosis causes emotional distress, which can influence patients' treatment choice. This study aimed to investigate the effect of increased emotionally supportive surgeon communication in a virtual setting on treatment preference for thyroid cancer.DesignThis randomized trial (NCT05132478), conducted from November 2021 to February 2023, enrolled adults with ≤4-cm thyroid nodules not requiring surgery. Participants were randomized 1:1 to watch a virtual clinic visit depicting a patient-surgeon treatment discussion for low-risk thyroid cancer. Control and intervention videos were identical except for added emotionally supportive communication in the intervention. The primary outcome was treatment preference for total thyroidectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes were perceived physician empathy, physician trust, decisional confidence, and disease-specific knowledge. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using conditional regression to account for stratification by sex. Qualitative content analysis evaluated participants' open-ended responses about treatment choice and surgeon communication.ResultsOf 208 eligible patients, 118 (56.7%) participated. Participants were 85.6% female and 88.1% White. Overall, 89.0% (n = 105) of participants preferred lobectomy, which was similar between the intervention and control groups (90.0% v. 87.9%, respectively, P = 0.72). Compared with control, participants who viewed the consultation with enhanced communication perceived higher levels of physician empathy (34.5 ± 5.8 v. 25.9 ± 9.1, P < 0.001) and reported increased trust in the physician (12.0 ± 2.6 v. 10.4 ± 3.1, P < 0.001). The groups were similar in decisional confidence (7.6 ± 2.1 v. 7.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.74) and disease-specific knowledge. Prominent qualitative themes among participants choosing thyroid lobectomy included desire to avoid daily thyroid hormone (n = 53) and concerns about surgical complications (n = 25).ConclusionsIn this randomized controlled study, a significant proportion of participants preferred thyroid lobectomy if diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer. Participants perceived increased empathy when provided even in the virtual setting, which was associated with increased trust in the physician.HighlightsIn this single-site, randomized controlled trial, enhanced emotionally supportive surgeon communication had no effect on hypothetical treatment preference for low-risk thyroid cancer.Participants who experienced enhanced emotionally supportive surgeon communication perceived higher physician empathy and reported greater trust in the physician.The incorporation of empathetic communication during surgical consultation for low-risk thyroid cancer promotes patient trust and perception of empathy.

外科医生沟通策略对甲状腺癌治疗偏好的影响:一项随机试验。
癌症诊断会导致情绪困扰,从而影响患者的治疗选择。本研究旨在探讨在虚拟环境中增加情感支持的外科医生交流对甲状腺癌治疗偏好的影响。该随机试验(NCT05132478)于2021年11月至2023年2月进行,纳入不需要手术治疗的≤4厘米甲状腺结节的成年人。参与者按1:1的比例随机观看一场虚拟的诊所访问,该访问描述了低风险甲状腺癌的患者与外科医生的治疗讨论。除了在干预中增加了情感支持交流外,控制视频和干预视频是相同的。主要结局是选择全甲状腺切除术还是肺叶切除术。次要结果是感知到的医生共情、医生信任、决策信心和疾病特异性知识。使用条件回归进行意向治疗分析,以解释性别分层。定性内容分析评估了参与者关于治疗选择和外科医生沟通的开放式回答。结果208例符合条件的患者中,118例(56.7%)参与了研究。参与者中85.6%为女性,88.1%为白人。总体而言,89.0% (n = 105)的参与者倾向于肺叶切除术,干预组与对照组相似(90.0% vs 87.9%, P = 0.72)。与对照组相比,看了加强沟通咨询的参与者对医生的同理心(34.5±5.8 vs . 25.9±9.1,P P P = 0.74)和疾病特异性知识的感知水平更高。在选择甲状腺小叶切除术的参与者中,突出的定性主题包括希望避免每天使用甲状腺激素(n = 53)和对手术并发症的担忧(n = 25)。结论:在这项随机对照研究中,如果诊断为低风险甲状腺癌,很大比例的参与者倾向于甲状腺小叶切除术。即使是在虚拟环境中,参与者也能感受到更多的同理心,这与对医生的信任增加有关。在这项单点随机对照试验中,增强的外科医生情感支持沟通对低风险甲状腺癌的假设治疗偏好没有影响。经历了情感支持的外科医生交流的参与者感知到更高的医生同理心,并报告了对医生更大的信任。在低风险甲状腺癌的外科会诊中纳入共情沟通可促进患者的信任和共情感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信