Originalbeiträge (Originals). Mentalisierungsfähigkeit älterer Patient:innen mit psychischen Erkrankungen – Fremdeinschätzungen durch Psychotherapeut:innen / Mentalization ability of older patients with mental illness – external assessments by psychotherapists.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Meinolf Peters, Tobias Becker
{"title":"Originalbeiträge (Originals). Mentalisierungsfähigkeit älterer Patient:innen mit psychischen Erkrankungen – Fremdeinschätzungen durch Psychotherapeut:innen / Mentalization ability of older patients with mental illness – external assessments by psychotherapists.","authors":"Meinolf Peters, Tobias Becker","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2025.71.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mentalization ability of older patients with mental illness - external assessments by psychotherapists Background: The construct of mentalization ability is becoming increasingly important in modern psychotherapy, but little is known about the mentalizing abilities of older patients. Initial results on theory of mind abilities indicate deficits. However, this only sheds light on one aspect of the ability to mentalize. The present study was concerned with a more comprehensive examination of mentalization abilities in older patients and their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the ÄPP study (Older Patients in Psychotherapy), a sample (N = 527) was examined using the Modes of Mentalization Scale, whereby psychotherapists were each asked to assess a younger or older patient, i. e. psychotherapists acted as raters here. In addition, the psychotherapists were asked to assess the rated patient with regard to various clinical parameters (e. g. suitability for psychotherapy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older patients show deficits in mentalization skills compared to younger patients, although these are lower than expected. The reasons for this are discussed as a result of selection factors in psychotherapeutic care. In older patients, however, the assessment of a more limited mentalization ability has a more far-reaching influence on the therapist's clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The therapeutic focus should be on promoting the ability to mentalize. But psychotherapists should also be better trained to deal with corresponding deficits in older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"71 1","pages":"4-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2025.71.1.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mentalization ability of older patients with mental illness - external assessments by psychotherapists Background: The construct of mentalization ability is becoming increasingly important in modern psychotherapy, but little is known about the mentalizing abilities of older patients. Initial results on theory of mind abilities indicate deficits. However, this only sheds light on one aspect of the ability to mentalize. The present study was concerned with a more comprehensive examination of mentalization abilities in older patients and their clinical significance.

Methods: As part of the ÄPP study (Older Patients in Psychotherapy), a sample (N = 527) was examined using the Modes of Mentalization Scale, whereby psychotherapists were each asked to assess a younger or older patient, i. e. psychotherapists acted as raters here. In addition, the psychotherapists were asked to assess the rated patient with regard to various clinical parameters (e. g. suitability for psychotherapy).

Results: Older patients show deficits in mentalization skills compared to younger patients, although these are lower than expected. The reasons for this are discussed as a result of selection factors in psychotherapeutic care. In older patients, however, the assessment of a more limited mentalization ability has a more far-reaching influence on the therapist's clinical assessment.

Conclusions: The therapeutic focus should be on promoting the ability to mentalize. But psychotherapists should also be better trained to deal with corresponding deficits in older patients.

Originalbeiträge(原版).老年精神疾病患者的心理能力-心理治疗师的外部评估。
背景:心理化能力的构建在现代心理治疗中越来越重要,但对老年患者心理化能力的了解却很少。心智理论能力的初步结果显示出缺陷。然而,这只揭示了思维能力的一个方面。本研究对老年患者的心智化能力及其临床意义进行了更全面的研究。方法:作为ÄPP研究(心理治疗中的老年患者)的一部分,使用心理化模式量表对样本(N = 527)进行了检查,其中每位心理治疗师被要求评估一位年轻或年长的患者,即心理治疗师在这里扮演评分者的角色。此外,心理治疗师被要求就各种临床参数(如心理治疗的适用性)对被评定的患者进行评估。结果:与年轻患者相比,老年患者在心智化技能方面表现出缺陷,尽管这些缺陷低于预期。这是由于心理治疗护理的选择因素。然而,在老年患者中,对更有限的心智化能力的评估对治疗师的临床评估有更深远的影响。结论:治疗的重点应放在提高心理能力上。但心理治疗师也应该接受更好的培训,以应对老年患者相应的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信