Artificial Intelligence to Promote Racial and Ethnic Cardiovascular Health Equity.

IF 2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s12170-024-00745-6
Daniel Amponsah, Ritu Thamman, Eric Brandt, Cornelius James, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Celina M Yong
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence to Promote Racial and Ethnic Cardiovascular Health Equity.","authors":"Daniel Amponsah, Ritu Thamman, Eric Brandt, Cornelius James, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Celina M Yong","doi":"10.1007/s12170-024-00745-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine holds promise for transformative advancements aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. Amidst this promise, AI has been envisioned as a tool to detect and mitigate racial and ethnic inequity known to plague current cardiovascular care. However, this enthusiasm is dampened by the recognition that AI itself can harbor and propagate biases, necessitating a careful approach to ensure equity. This review highlights topics in the landscape of AI in cardiology, its role in identifying and addressing healthcare inequities, promoting diversity in research, concerns surrounding its applications, and proposed strategies for fostering equitable utilization.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Artificial intelligence has proven to be a valuable tool for clinicians in diagnosing and mitigating racial and ethnic inequities in cardiology, as well as the promotion of diversity in research. This promise is counterbalanced by the cautionary reality that AI can inadvertently perpetuate existent biases stemming from limited diversity in training data, inherent biases within datasets, and inadequate bias detection and monitoring mechanisms. Recognizing these concerns, experts emphasize the need for rigorous efforts to address these limitations in the development and deployment of AI within medicine.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Implementing AI in cardiovascular care to identify and address racial and ethnic inequities requires careful design and execution, beginning with meticulous data collection and a thorough review of training datasets. Furthermore, ensuring equitable performance involves rigorous testing and continuous surveillance of algorithms. Lastly, the promotion of diversity in the AI workforce and engagement of stakeholders are crucial to the advancement of equity to ultimately realize the potential for artificial intelligence for cardiovascular health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46144,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports","volume":"18 11","pages":"153-162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-024-00745-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine holds promise for transformative advancements aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. Amidst this promise, AI has been envisioned as a tool to detect and mitigate racial and ethnic inequity known to plague current cardiovascular care. However, this enthusiasm is dampened by the recognition that AI itself can harbor and propagate biases, necessitating a careful approach to ensure equity. This review highlights topics in the landscape of AI in cardiology, its role in identifying and addressing healthcare inequities, promoting diversity in research, concerns surrounding its applications, and proposed strategies for fostering equitable utilization.

Recent findings: Artificial intelligence has proven to be a valuable tool for clinicians in diagnosing and mitigating racial and ethnic inequities in cardiology, as well as the promotion of diversity in research. This promise is counterbalanced by the cautionary reality that AI can inadvertently perpetuate existent biases stemming from limited diversity in training data, inherent biases within datasets, and inadequate bias detection and monitoring mechanisms. Recognizing these concerns, experts emphasize the need for rigorous efforts to address these limitations in the development and deployment of AI within medicine.

Summary: Implementing AI in cardiovascular care to identify and address racial and ethnic inequities requires careful design and execution, beginning with meticulous data collection and a thorough review of training datasets. Furthermore, ensuring equitable performance involves rigorous testing and continuous surveillance of algorithms. Lastly, the promotion of diversity in the AI workforce and engagement of stakeholders are crucial to the advancement of equity to ultimately realize the potential for artificial intelligence for cardiovascular health equity.

人工智能促进种族和民族心血管健康公平。
综述目的:人工智能(AI)在医学中的整合有望带来旨在改善医疗保健结果的变革性进步。在这一前景中,人工智能被设想为一种工具,用于检测和减轻目前困扰心血管护理的种族和民族不平等现象。然而,人们认识到人工智能本身可以庇护和传播偏见,因此需要谨慎的方法来确保公平,这种热情受到了抑制。本综述强调了人工智能在心脏病学领域的主题,其在识别和解决医疗保健不公平方面的作用,促进研究多样性,围绕其应用的关注,以及促进公平利用的拟议策略。最近的发现:人工智能已被证明是临床医生在诊断和减轻心脏病学中种族和民族不平等以及促进研究多样性方面的宝贵工具。这一承诺被一个令人警惕的现实所抵消,即人工智能可能会无意中延续现有的偏见,这些偏见源于训练数据的有限多样性、数据集中的固有偏见,以及偏见检测和监测机制的不足。认识到这些担忧,专家们强调需要采取严格措施,解决在医学领域开发和部署人工智能方面的这些限制。摘要:在心血管护理中实施人工智能以识别和解决种族和民族不平等问题需要仔细设计和执行,首先要仔细收集数据并彻底审查培训数据集。此外,确保公平的性能需要对算法进行严格的测试和持续的监督。最后,促进人工智能工作人员的多样性和利益攸关方的参与对于促进公平,最终实现人工智能在心血管健康公平方面的潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to keep readers informed by providing cutting-edge reviews on key topics pertaining to cardiovascular risk. We use a systematic approach: international experts prepare timely articles on relevant topics that highlight the most important recent original publications. We accomplish this aim by appointing Section Editors in major subject areas across the discipline of cardiovascular medicine to select topics for review articles by leading experts who emphasize recent developments and highlight important papers published in the past year. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信