Family engagement on neuroscience units with Post-covid visiting policies: A retrospective chart review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Jennifer Morgan, Jennifer Cahill, Christine Ritchie, Lingling Zhang, Priscilla Gazarian
{"title":"Family engagement on neuroscience units with Post-covid visiting policies: A retrospective chart review.","authors":"Jennifer Morgan, Jennifer Cahill, Christine Ritchie, Lingling Zhang, Priscilla Gazarian","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family engagement is crucial for achieving successful outcomes for both patients and hospitals. It supports safe transitions between care settings, providers, and ultimately, as illness progresses. However, in the hospital setting, family engagement is poorly operationalized. While the existing literature acknowledges its benefits, it does not adequately define the specific domains of family engagement, the roles families play during inpatient care, or whether these factors differ across patient populations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This research aims to describe family engagement in the hospital setting and examine whether differences exist in documentation across various populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review (RCR) was conducted using data extracted from the electronic medical records (EMRs) of adult patients admitted to neuroscience units at an academic medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous and categorical variables. Chi-square analysis was performed on categorical variables (e.g., race, social deprivation index [SDI], cognitive impairment) to identify statistically significant differences between groups, with a threshold of p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The RCR included data of 293 patient records. The results reveal what is documented regarding family engagement in the EMR, who is documenting it, and where it is recorded. No differences were found in the documentation of engagement domains between Black and White patients, between patients with high and low SDI, or between patients with cognitive impairment and those without. However, differences were observed in documentation related to discharge placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results have implications for further research, policy development, and provider education. They underscore the need for a structured template in the EMR and suggest potential implications for nursing diagnoses and interventions to better support family engagement in the hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family engagement is crucial for achieving successful outcomes for both patients and hospitals. It supports safe transitions between care settings, providers, and ultimately, as illness progresses. However, in the hospital setting, family engagement is poorly operationalized. While the existing literature acknowledges its benefits, it does not adequately define the specific domains of family engagement, the roles families play during inpatient care, or whether these factors differ across patient populations.

Aims: This research aims to describe family engagement in the hospital setting and examine whether differences exist in documentation across various populations.

Methods: A retrospective chart review (RCR) was conducted using data extracted from the electronic medical records (EMRs) of adult patients admitted to neuroscience units at an academic medical center. Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous and categorical variables. Chi-square analysis was performed on categorical variables (e.g., race, social deprivation index [SDI], cognitive impairment) to identify statistically significant differences between groups, with a threshold of p < 0.05.

Findings: The RCR included data of 293 patient records. The results reveal what is documented regarding family engagement in the EMR, who is documenting it, and where it is recorded. No differences were found in the documentation of engagement domains between Black and White patients, between patients with high and low SDI, or between patients with cognitive impairment and those without. However, differences were observed in documentation related to discharge placement.

Conclusion: These results have implications for further research, policy development, and provider education. They underscore the need for a structured template in the EMR and suggest potential implications for nursing diagnoses and interventions to better support family engagement in the hospital setting.

家庭参与神经科学单位与后冠状病毒访问政策:回顾性图表审查。
背景:家庭参与对于患者和医院取得成功的结果至关重要。它支持护理机构、提供者之间的安全过渡,并最终支持疾病进展。然而,在医院环境中,家庭参与的操作性很差。虽然现有文献承认它的好处,但它没有充分定义家庭参与的具体领域,家庭在住院治疗期间扮演的角色,或者这些因素是否因患者群体而异。目的:本研究旨在描述医院环境中的家庭参与,并检查不同人群的文献是否存在差异。方法:采用回顾性图表回顾(RCR)方法,对某学术医疗中心神经科学科室收治的成年患者的电子病历(EMRs)进行数据提取。对连续变量和分类变量进行描述性统计。对分类变量(如种族、社会剥夺指数[SDI]、认知功能障碍)进行卡方分析,发现组间差异有统计学意义,阈值为p。结果揭示了电子病历中关于家庭参与的记录,记录者以及记录地点。在黑人和白人患者、高SDI和低SDI患者、有认知障碍的患者和没有认知障碍的患者之间,参与域的记录没有发现差异。然而,在与出院安置有关的文件中观察到差异。结论:这些结果对进一步的研究、政策制定和提供者教育具有启示意义。他们强调了在电子病历中建立一个结构化模板的必要性,并提出了护理诊断和干预措施的潜在含义,以更好地支持医院环境中的家庭参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信