Free omental patch as the promising future for incisional hernia surgery: an experimental study in rat model.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2025-03-01
I Sofii, I Widodo, Gunadi, A Y Handaya
{"title":"Free omental patch as the promising future for incisional hernia surgery: an experimental study in rat model.","authors":"I Sofii, I Widodo, Gunadi, A Y Handaya","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Incisional hernia is the common complication of abdominal surgery with serious morbidity. The use of Composite mesh (CM) is the current gold standard, which is superior to Polypropylene mesh (PPM) for closing the defect, due to its minimal intraabdominal adhesion. In this study, we were using the novel combination of free omental patch (FOP) and PPM compared to CM for defect closure surgery in incisional hernia using rat models. We compared the gene expression of VEGF, COL3A1, COL1A1, COL1A2, and ratio of COL1A1/COL3A1 as the representative of wound healing process from all treatment options.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighteen wistar rats were made into incisional hernia models and divided into three groups of FOP, FOP-PPM, and CM at the 14th day. After each group underwent hernia repair, abdominal wall samples were taken to examine the expression of qPCR VEGF, COL3A1, COL1A1, and COL1A2 at the 21st day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant different in the gene expression of VEGF, COL3A1, COL1A1, COL1A2 and COL1A1/COL3A1 ratio between FOP, FOP-PPM and CM group (p-value >0.05). In addition, non-significant result also found at the comparative analysis between FOP-PPM and MC groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FOP can give the similar result as CM for defect closure surgery in incisional hernia, either when combined with PPM or as a single option. However, further clinical study is needed to support this animal study.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 2","pages":"174-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Incisional hernia is the common complication of abdominal surgery with serious morbidity. The use of Composite mesh (CM) is the current gold standard, which is superior to Polypropylene mesh (PPM) for closing the defect, due to its minimal intraabdominal adhesion. In this study, we were using the novel combination of free omental patch (FOP) and PPM compared to CM for defect closure surgery in incisional hernia using rat models. We compared the gene expression of VEGF, COL3A1, COL1A1, COL1A2, and ratio of COL1A1/COL3A1 as the representative of wound healing process from all treatment options.

Materials and methods: Eighteen wistar rats were made into incisional hernia models and divided into three groups of FOP, FOP-PPM, and CM at the 14th day. After each group underwent hernia repair, abdominal wall samples were taken to examine the expression of qPCR VEGF, COL3A1, COL1A1, and COL1A2 at the 21st day.

Results: There were no significant different in the gene expression of VEGF, COL3A1, COL1A1, COL1A2 and COL1A1/COL3A1 ratio between FOP, FOP-PPM and CM group (p-value >0.05). In addition, non-significant result also found at the comparative analysis between FOP-PPM and MC groups.

Conclusions: FOP can give the similar result as CM for defect closure surgery in incisional hernia, either when combined with PPM or as a single option. However, further clinical study is needed to support this animal study.

大鼠模型实验研究:游离网膜贴片作为切口疝手术的前景。
切口疝是腹部外科手术常见的并发症,发病率高。复合补片(CM)的使用是目前的金标准,它优于聚丙烯补片(PPM),因为它的腹腔内粘连最小。在这项研究中,我们使用自由网膜贴片(FOP)和PPM的新组合,与CM相比,用于大鼠切口疝的缺陷闭合手术。我们比较了所有治疗方案中VEGF、COL3A1、COL1A1、COL1A2的基因表达以及COL1A1/COL3A1比值作为伤口愈合过程的代表。材料与方法:将18只wistar大鼠制成切口疝模型,第14天分为FOP组、FOP- ppm组和CM组。各组疝修补术后,于第21天取腹壁标本,检测qPCR中VEGF、COL3A1、COL1A1、COL1A2的表达。结果:FOP组、FOP- ppm组与CM组VEGF、COL3A1、COL1A1、COL1A2基因表达及COL1A1/COL3A1比值差异无统计学意义(p值bb0 0.05)。此外,在FOP-PPM与MC组的比较分析中也发现了不显著的结果。结论:无论是与PPM联合使用还是单独使用,FOP在切口疝缺陷闭合手术中的效果与CM相似。然而,需要进一步的临床研究来支持这一动物研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信