Situational awareness and situational heroism: a close reading of testimonies from the London Bridge terror attack 2019.

IF 1.8 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Critical Studies on Security Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21624887.2024.2388319
Katharina Karcher
{"title":"Situational awareness and situational heroism: a close reading of testimonies from the London Bridge terror attack 2019.","authors":"Katharina Karcher","doi":"10.1080/21624887.2024.2388319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on an-in depth analysis of two testimonies, this article explores how ordinary people can become 'situational heroes'. On 29 November 2019, Darryn Frost and Steve Gallant were caught up in a terrorist attack in central London. In that situation, Frost and Gallant demonstrated a high degree of situational awareness and took bold and swift action to stop the attacker. Using the literary method of close reading, I analyse their testimonies with a particular eye towards two questions: how did the two men perceive the dangerous situation? Can and should they be seen as heroes? As a convicted murderer and long-serving prisoner, Gallant was certainly no hero in the conventional sense. Yet, in 2023 he received The Queen's Gallantry Medal for 'for acts of exemplary bravery' alongside with Frost and a few others. This, I argue, is symptomatic of a broader shift towards situational awareness and towards what I call situational heroism. As it is less about <i>being</i> a hero and more about<i>acting heroically</i> in particular situations, situational heroism is less elitist and more inclusive than many historical forms of heroism. However, it also raises new ethical questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":29930,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies on Security","volume":"13 1","pages":"58-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies on Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2024.2388319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on an-in depth analysis of two testimonies, this article explores how ordinary people can become 'situational heroes'. On 29 November 2019, Darryn Frost and Steve Gallant were caught up in a terrorist attack in central London. In that situation, Frost and Gallant demonstrated a high degree of situational awareness and took bold and swift action to stop the attacker. Using the literary method of close reading, I analyse their testimonies with a particular eye towards two questions: how did the two men perceive the dangerous situation? Can and should they be seen as heroes? As a convicted murderer and long-serving prisoner, Gallant was certainly no hero in the conventional sense. Yet, in 2023 he received The Queen's Gallantry Medal for 'for acts of exemplary bravery' alongside with Frost and a few others. This, I argue, is symptomatic of a broader shift towards situational awareness and towards what I call situational heroism. As it is less about being a hero and more aboutacting heroically in particular situations, situational heroism is less elitist and more inclusive than many historical forms of heroism. However, it also raises new ethical questions.

情境意识和情境英雄主义:仔细阅读2019年伦敦桥恐怖袭击的证词。
本文通过对两个证言的深入分析,探讨普通人如何成为“情境英雄”。2019年11月29日,达林·弗罗斯特和史蒂夫·加兰特在伦敦市中心遭遇恐怖袭击。在这种情况下,弗罗斯特和加兰特表现出了高度的态势感知能力,并采取了大胆而迅速的行动来阻止袭击者。我运用细读的文学方法,分析了他们的证词,特别关注了两个问题:这两个人是如何看待危险局势的?他们可以也应该被视为英雄吗?作为一名被定罪的杀人犯和长期服刑的囚犯,加兰特当然不是传统意义上的英雄。然而,在2023年,他与弗罗斯特和其他一些人一起获得了女王的英勇勋章,以表彰他“堪称楷模的勇敢行为”。我认为,这是一种向情境意识和情境英雄主义更广泛转变的征兆。情境英雄主义与其说是关于成为英雄,不如说是关于在特定情况下的英雄行为,因此比起许多历史上的英雄主义形式,情境英雄主义不那么精英化,而且更具包容性。然而,这也引发了新的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信