Food and Housing Insecurity, Resource Allocation, and Follow-up in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Raymen R Assaf, Chloe Knudsen-Robbins, Theodore Heyming, Kellie Bacon, Shelby K Shelton, Bharath Chakravarthy, Soheil Saadat, Jason A Douglas, Victor Cisneros
{"title":"Food and Housing Insecurity, Resource Allocation, and Follow-up in a Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Raymen R Assaf, Chloe Knudsen-Robbins, Theodore Heyming, Kellie Bacon, Shelby K Shelton, Bharath Chakravarthy, Soheil Saadat, Jason A Douglas, Victor Cisneros","doi":"10.5811/westjem.19435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Food and housing insecurity in childhood is troublingly widespread. Emergency departments (ED) are well positioned to identify and support food- and housing-insecure children and their families. However, there is no consensus regarding the most efficient screening tools or most effective interventions for ED use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this cross-sectional study we aimed to investigate the implementation of a food/ housing insecurity screening tool and resource referral uptake in a pediatric ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the study period (March 1-December 9, 2021), there were 67,297 ED visits at the study institution, which is a freestanding children's hospital. Caregivers of patients presenting to the ED were approached for participation in the study; 1,908 families participated (2.8% of all ED visits during the study period) and were screened for food and housing insecurity. Caregiver surveys included demographic, food and housing insecurity, caregiver/patient health status, and healthcare utilization questions. Caregivers who screened positive for food and/or housing insecurity received printed materials with food and/or housing resources. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and the Pearson chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,908 caregivers were surveyed: 416 (21.8%) screened positive for food and/or housing insecurity. Of those who screened positive, 147/416 completed follow-up surveys. On follow-up, 44 (30.0%) no longer screened positive for food and/or housing insecurity, while 15 (10.2%) reported using at least one resource referral. The most frequently reported referral utilization barrier was loss or reported non-receipt of the referral.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates high food- and housing-insecurity rates among families presenting to a pediatric ED, emphasizing the urgency and necessity of screening and intervening in this environment. The food and housing insecurity change between baseline and follow-up reported here and the overall low resource uptake highlights challenges with ED-based screening and intervention efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"326-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.19435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Food and housing insecurity in childhood is troublingly widespread. Emergency departments (ED) are well positioned to identify and support food- and housing-insecure children and their families. However, there is no consensus regarding the most efficient screening tools or most effective interventions for ED use.

Objective: In this cross-sectional study we aimed to investigate the implementation of a food/ housing insecurity screening tool and resource referral uptake in a pediatric ED.

Methods: During the study period (March 1-December 9, 2021), there were 67,297 ED visits at the study institution, which is a freestanding children's hospital. Caregivers of patients presenting to the ED were approached for participation in the study; 1,908 families participated (2.8% of all ED visits during the study period) and were screened for food and housing insecurity. Caregiver surveys included demographic, food and housing insecurity, caregiver/patient health status, and healthcare utilization questions. Caregivers who screened positive for food and/or housing insecurity received printed materials with food and/or housing resources. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and the Pearson chi-squared test.

Results: A total of 1,908 caregivers were surveyed: 416 (21.8%) screened positive for food and/or housing insecurity. Of those who screened positive, 147/416 completed follow-up surveys. On follow-up, 44 (30.0%) no longer screened positive for food and/or housing insecurity, while 15 (10.2%) reported using at least one resource referral. The most frequently reported referral utilization barrier was loss or reported non-receipt of the referral.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates high food- and housing-insecurity rates among families presenting to a pediatric ED, emphasizing the urgency and necessity of screening and intervening in this environment. The food and housing insecurity change between baseline and follow-up reported here and the overall low resource uptake highlights challenges with ED-based screening and intervention efficacy.

儿童急诊科的食物和住房不安全、资源分配和随访。
儿童食品和住房不安全问题普遍存在,令人不安。急诊部门完全有能力识别和支持没有粮食和住房保障的儿童及其家庭。然而,关于ED使用的最有效的筛查工具或最有效的干预措施尚无共识。目的:在这项横断面研究中,我们旨在调查儿童ED中食品/住房不安全筛查工具和资源转诊的实施情况。方法:在研究期间(2021年3月1日至12月9日),研究机构ED就诊67,297次,该机构是一家独立的儿童医院。在急诊科就诊的患者的护理人员被邀请参与研究;1908个家庭参与(占研究期间所有ED访问的2.8%),并对食物和住房不安全进行了筛查。护理人员调查包括人口统计、食物和住房不安全、护理人员/患者健康状况和医疗保健利用问题。对食物和/或住房不安全筛查呈阳性的护理人员收到了印有食物和/或住房资源的印刷材料。我们使用描述性统计、单因素方差分析和皮尔逊卡方检验来分析数据。结果:共调查了1908名护理人员:416名(21.8%)对食物和/或住房不安全筛查呈阳性。在筛查呈阳性的人中,147/416人完成了随访调查。在随访中,44人(30.0%)不再对食物和/或住房不安全进行阳性筛查,而15人(10.2%)报告至少使用了一种资源转诊。最常报告的转诊利用障碍是丢失或报告未收到转诊。结论:本研究表明,在儿科急诊科就诊的家庭中,食物和住房不安全率很高,强调了在这种环境下进行筛查和干预的紧迫性和必要性。这里报告的食物和住房不安全状况在基线和随访期间的变化,以及总体上较低的资源吸收,突出了基于ed的筛查和干预效果方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信