Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Samuel J Stellpflug, William H Menton, Bjorn C Westgard, Ryan D Johnsen, Alexander M Coomes, Robert C LeFevere, Michael D Zwank
{"title":"Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration.","authors":"Samuel J Stellpflug, William H Menton, Bjorn C Westgard, Ryan D Johnsen, Alexander M Coomes, Robert C LeFevere, Michael D Zwank","doi":"10.5811/westjem.24998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The gold standard for quantifying ethanol intoxication in patients is serum testing. However, breath testing is faster, less expensive, and less invasive. It is unknown whether perceived effort during a breath ethanol test impacts the accuracy of the test and the correlation with serum concentration. In this study we analyzed whether perceived \"poor\" effort during breath ethanol testing would result in worse correlation than perceived \"normal\" breath-testing effort with respect to serum ethanol concentration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were identified retrospectively over a 49-month period if they had both a breath ethanol test and a serum ethanol test obtained during the same ED visit within 60 minutes of each other, if they had their effort during the breath test recorded as \"normal\" or \"poor\" by the person administering the test, and had non-zero breath and serum ethanol concentrations. We completed descriptive and correlation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 480 patients were enrolled, 245 with normal and 235 with poor effort. The patients with normal breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and 0.23 g/dL, respectively. The patients with poor breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 and 0.29 g/dL, respectively. The correlation coefficient between breath and serum ethanol values was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.96) for good effort and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.74) for poor effort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The assessment of breath exhalation effort is meaningful in determining how well a patient's breath ethanol level correlates with the serum ethanol concentration. Poor breath effort, when compared to normal breath effort, was associated with higher ethanol levels as well as a larger difference and a greater variability between breath and serum values. If an accurate ethanol level is important for clinical decision-making, a physician should not rely on a poor-effort breathalyzer value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"364-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.24998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The gold standard for quantifying ethanol intoxication in patients is serum testing. However, breath testing is faster, less expensive, and less invasive. It is unknown whether perceived effort during a breath ethanol test impacts the accuracy of the test and the correlation with serum concentration. In this study we analyzed whether perceived "poor" effort during breath ethanol testing would result in worse correlation than perceived "normal" breath-testing effort with respect to serum ethanol concentration.

Methods: Subjects were identified retrospectively over a 49-month period if they had both a breath ethanol test and a serum ethanol test obtained during the same ED visit within 60 minutes of each other, if they had their effort during the breath test recorded as "normal" or "poor" by the person administering the test, and had non-zero breath and serum ethanol concentrations. We completed descriptive and correlation analyses.

Results: A total of 480 patients were enrolled, 245 with normal and 235 with poor effort. The patients with normal breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and 0.23 g/dL, respectively. The patients with poor breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 and 0.29 g/dL, respectively. The correlation coefficient between breath and serum ethanol values was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.96) for good effort and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.74) for poor effort.

Conclusion: The assessment of breath exhalation effort is meaningful in determining how well a patient's breath ethanol level correlates with the serum ethanol concentration. Poor breath effort, when compared to normal breath effort, was associated with higher ethanol levels as well as a larger difference and a greater variability between breath and serum values. If an accurate ethanol level is important for clinical decision-making, a physician should not rely on a poor-effort breathalyzer value.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信