Development of a Reliable, Valid Procedural Checklist for Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance of Emergency Cricothyrotomy.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Dana E Loke, Andrew M Rogers, Morgan L McCarthy, Maren K Leibowitz, Elizabeth T Stulpin, David H Salzman
{"title":"Development of a Reliable, Valid Procedural Checklist for Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Performance of Emergency Cricothyrotomy.","authors":"Dana E Loke, Andrew M Rogers, Morgan L McCarthy, Maren K Leibowitz, Elizabeth T Stulpin, David H Salzman","doi":"10.5811/westjem.20365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency cricothyrotomy is a rare but potentially life-saving procedure performed by emergency physicians. A comprehensive, dichotomous procedural checklist for emergency cricothyrotomy for emergency medicine (EM) resident education does not exist.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a checklist containing the critical steps for performing an open emergency cricothyrotomy, to assess performance of EM residents performing an open emergency cricothyrotomy using the checklist on a simulator, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the checklist for performing the procedure.</p><p><strong>Curricular design: </strong>We developed a preliminary checklist based on literature review and sent it to experts in EM and trauma surgery. A modified Delphi approach was used to revise the checklist and reach consensus on a final version of the checklist. To assess usability of the checklist, we assessed EM residents using a cricothyrotomy task trainer. Scores were determined by the number of correctly performed items. We calculated inter-rater reliability using the Cohen kappa coefficient. Validity was assessed using the Welch <i>t</i>-test to compare the performance of residents who had and had not performed an open emergency cricothyrotomy, and we used analysis of variance to compare performance of postgraduate year (PGY) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Impact/effectiveness: </strong>The final 27-item checklist was developed after three rounds of revisions. Inter-rater reliability was strong overall (κ = 0.812) with individual checklist items ranging from slight to nearly perfect agreement. A total of 56 residents participated, with an average score of 14.3 (52.9%). Performance varied significantly among PGY groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Residents who had performed an emergency cricothyrotomy previously performed significantly better than those who had not <i>(P</i> = 0.005). The developed checklist, which can be used in procedural training for open emergency cricothyrotomy, suggests that improved training approaches to teaching and assessing emergency cricothyrotomy are needed given the overall poor performance of this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.20365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency cricothyrotomy is a rare but potentially life-saving procedure performed by emergency physicians. A comprehensive, dichotomous procedural checklist for emergency cricothyrotomy for emergency medicine (EM) resident education does not exist.

Objectives: We aimed to develop a checklist containing the critical steps for performing an open emergency cricothyrotomy, to assess performance of EM residents performing an open emergency cricothyrotomy using the checklist on a simulator, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the checklist for performing the procedure.

Curricular design: We developed a preliminary checklist based on literature review and sent it to experts in EM and trauma surgery. A modified Delphi approach was used to revise the checklist and reach consensus on a final version of the checklist. To assess usability of the checklist, we assessed EM residents using a cricothyrotomy task trainer. Scores were determined by the number of correctly performed items. We calculated inter-rater reliability using the Cohen kappa coefficient. Validity was assessed using the Welch t-test to compare the performance of residents who had and had not performed an open emergency cricothyrotomy, and we used analysis of variance to compare performance of postgraduate year (PGY) cohorts.

Impact/effectiveness: The final 27-item checklist was developed after three rounds of revisions. Inter-rater reliability was strong overall (κ = 0.812) with individual checklist items ranging from slight to nearly perfect agreement. A total of 56 residents participated, with an average score of 14.3 (52.9%). Performance varied significantly among PGY groups (P < 0.001). Residents who had performed an emergency cricothyrotomy previously performed significantly better than those who had not (P = 0.005). The developed checklist, which can be used in procedural training for open emergency cricothyrotomy, suggests that improved training approaches to teaching and assessing emergency cricothyrotomy are needed given the overall poor performance of this cohort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信