Relationship Between Social Risk Factors and Emergency Department Use: National Health Interview Survey 2016-2018.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Iraa Guleria, Jennifer A Campbell, Abigail Thorgerson, Sanjay Bhandari, Leonard E Egede
{"title":"Relationship Between Social Risk Factors and Emergency Department Use: National Health Interview Survey 2016-2018.","authors":"Iraa Guleria, Jennifer A Campbell, Abigail Thorgerson, Sanjay Bhandari, Leonard E Egede","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence shows that social risks are highly prevalent in the patient population that presents to the emergency department (ED) for care; however, understanding the relationship between social risk factors and ED utilization at the population level remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Health Interview Survey from the 2016-2018 sample adult files. The sample included 82,364 individuals, representing a population size of 238,888,238. The primary independent variables included six social risk factors: economic instability; lack of community; educational deficit; food insecurity; social isolation; and inadequate access to care. The outcome included ED use in the prior year. Covariates included age, race/ethnicity, insurance status, obesity, mental health (depression/anxiety), and comorbidities. We ran logistic regression models to test the relationship between the independent and dependent variables adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study sample, 20% had at least one ED visit in the prior year. In the fully adjusted model, individuals reporting economic instability (odds ratio [OR] 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.42), lack of community (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15), educational deficit (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.18), food insecurity (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.66-1.89), and social isolation (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39) had significantly higher odds of ED use. Inadequate access to care was significantly related to lower odds of ED use (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social risk factors are significantly associated with higher odds of ED use in the United States adult population. Interventions that integrate social and medical needs are greatly needed, as is understanding the role that preventive medicine may play in reducing avoidable ED visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence shows that social risks are highly prevalent in the patient population that presents to the emergency department (ED) for care; however, understanding the relationship between social risk factors and ED utilization at the population level remains unknown.

Methods: We used the National Health Interview Survey from the 2016-2018 sample adult files. The sample included 82,364 individuals, representing a population size of 238,888,238. The primary independent variables included six social risk factors: economic instability; lack of community; educational deficit; food insecurity; social isolation; and inadequate access to care. The outcome included ED use in the prior year. Covariates included age, race/ethnicity, insurance status, obesity, mental health (depression/anxiety), and comorbidities. We ran logistic regression models to test the relationship between the independent and dependent variables adjusting for covariates.

Results: In the study sample, 20% had at least one ED visit in the prior year. In the fully adjusted model, individuals reporting economic instability (odds ratio [OR] 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.42), lack of community (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15), educational deficit (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.18), food insecurity (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.66-1.89), and social isolation (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39) had significantly higher odds of ED use. Inadequate access to care was significantly related to lower odds of ED use (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81).

Conclusions: Social risk factors are significantly associated with higher odds of ED use in the United States adult population. Interventions that integrate social and medical needs are greatly needed, as is understanding the role that preventive medicine may play in reducing avoidable ED visits.

社会危险因素与急诊科使用的关系:2016-2018年全国健康访谈调查。
背景:有证据表明,社会风险在急诊科(ED)就诊的患者群体中非常普遍;然而,在人群水平上,社会风险因素与ED使用之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:采用2016-2018年全国健康访谈调查成人样本文件。样本包括82364个人,代表了238,888,238的人口规模。主要自变量包括6个社会风险因素:经济不稳定;缺乏社区;教育财政赤字;食品不安全;社会隔离;以及获得医疗服务的机会不足。结果包括前一年的ED使用情况。协变量包括年龄、种族/民族、保险状况、肥胖、精神健康(抑郁/焦虑)和合并症。我们运行逻辑回归模型来检验自变量和因变量之间的关系,调整协变量。结果:在研究样本中,20%的患者在前一年至少去过一次急诊科。在完全调整后的模型中,报告经济不稳定(优势比[OR] 1.33, 95%置信区间[CI] 1.25-1.42)、缺乏社区(优势比[OR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15)、教育缺陷(优势比[OR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.18)、食品不安全(优势比[OR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.66-1.89)和社会孤立(优势比[OR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39)的个体使用ED的几率显著较高。获得护理的机会不足与ED使用的低几率显著相关(OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81)。结论:社会风险因素与美国成年人使用ED的高几率显著相关。整合社会和医疗需求的干预措施是非常必要的,正如了解预防医学在减少可避免的急诊科就诊方面可能发挥的作用一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信