Productivity and Efficiency Growth During Emergency Medicine Residency Training.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Matthew T Singh, David M Austin, Stephanie C Mullennix, Joshua C Reynolds, J Adam Oostema
{"title":"Productivity and Efficiency Growth During Emergency Medicine Residency Training.","authors":"Matthew T Singh, David M Austin, Stephanie C Mullennix, Joshua C Reynolds, J Adam Oostema","doi":"10.5811/westjem.21227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Throughout training, an emergency medicine (EM) resident is required to increase efficiency and productivity to ensure safe practice after graduation. Multitasking is one of the 22 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) EM milestones and is often measured through evaluations and observation. Providing quantitative data to both residents and residency administration on patients seen per hour (PPH) and efficiency could improve a resident experience and training in many ways. Our study was designed to analyze various throughput metrics and productivity trends using applied mathematics and a robust dataset. Our goals were to define the curve of resident PPH over time, adjust for relevant confounders, and analyze additional efficiency metrics related to throughput such as door-to-decision time (DTDT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a retrospective, observational design in a single, tertiary-care center emergency department (ED) that sees approximately 110,000 adult patients per year; our study spanned the period July 1, 2019-December 31, 2021. A total of 42 residents from an ACGME-accredited three-year residency were included in the analysis. We excluded patients <18 years of age. Data was collected using a secure data vendor, and we created an exponential regression model to assess resident PPH data. Additional models were created accounting for patient covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed a total of 79,232 patients over 30 months. Using an exponential equation and adjusting for patient covariates, median PPH started at 0.898 and ended at 1.425 PPH. The median PPH by postgraduate (PGY) year were 1.13 for PGY 1; 1.38 for PGY 2; and 1.38 for PGY 3. Median DTDT in minutes was as follows: 185 minutes for PGY 1; 171 for PGY 2; and 166 for PGY 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Productivity and efficiency metrics such as PPH and DTDT data are an essential part of working in an ED. Our study shows that residents improve with number of patients seen per hour over three years but tend to plateau in their second year. Door-to-decision time continued to improve throughout their three years of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"246-253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.21227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Throughout training, an emergency medicine (EM) resident is required to increase efficiency and productivity to ensure safe practice after graduation. Multitasking is one of the 22 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) EM milestones and is often measured through evaluations and observation. Providing quantitative data to both residents and residency administration on patients seen per hour (PPH) and efficiency could improve a resident experience and training in many ways. Our study was designed to analyze various throughput metrics and productivity trends using applied mathematics and a robust dataset. Our goals were to define the curve of resident PPH over time, adjust for relevant confounders, and analyze additional efficiency metrics related to throughput such as door-to-decision time (DTDT).

Methods: We used a retrospective, observational design in a single, tertiary-care center emergency department (ED) that sees approximately 110,000 adult patients per year; our study spanned the period July 1, 2019-December 31, 2021. A total of 42 residents from an ACGME-accredited three-year residency were included in the analysis. We excluded patients <18 years of age. Data was collected using a secure data vendor, and we created an exponential regression model to assess resident PPH data. Additional models were created accounting for patient covariates.

Results: We analyzed a total of 79,232 patients over 30 months. Using an exponential equation and adjusting for patient covariates, median PPH started at 0.898 and ended at 1.425 PPH. The median PPH by postgraduate (PGY) year were 1.13 for PGY 1; 1.38 for PGY 2; and 1.38 for PGY 3. Median DTDT in minutes was as follows: 185 minutes for PGY 1; 171 for PGY 2; and 166 for PGY 3.

Conclusion: Productivity and efficiency metrics such as PPH and DTDT data are an essential part of working in an ED. Our study shows that residents improve with number of patients seen per hour over three years but tend to plateau in their second year. Door-to-decision time continued to improve throughout their three years of training.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信