Prognosis of Audiologic Recovery From Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Corticosteroid Intervention: A Retrospective Chart Review Across Multiple Outcome Measures.

Q2 Social Sciences
Pauline P Huynh, Elias S Saba, Jacob E Hoerter, Nancy Jiang
{"title":"Prognosis of Audiologic Recovery From Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Corticosteroid Intervention: A Retrospective Chart Review Across Multiple Outcome Measures.","authors":"Pauline P Huynh, Elias S Saba, Jacob E Hoerter, Nancy Jiang","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate associations among pretreatment hearing deficit, corticosteroid intervention, and audiologic recovery among patients presenting with sudden sensorineural hearing loss within an integrated health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health records within a multicenter integrated health system were queried for clinical encounters with a diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in 2021. Patient demographics, audiometric data, and therapeutic steroid intervention were recorded. Audiologic response was defined as a decrease of 15 dB in 4-frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure tone average (PTA). Audiologic recovery, or complete response, was defined as a follow-up PTA (PTA2) of ≤ 25 dB or within 10 dB of 1) baseline or 2) contralateral ear. Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate for predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 403 patients (mean age 59.27 ± 15.80 years, 57.32% male) met inclusion criteria, of which 355 underwent corticosteroid intervention. The nonsteroid group had a less severe hearing deficit (median PTA1 49.38 dB vs 58.75 dB with steroid group; <i>P</i> < .05). Median PTA improvement was 6.25 dB with steroid therapy and 3.63 dB without (<i>P</i> < .05), but median PTA2 between steroid and nonsteroid users was not significantly different (42.5 dB and 38.13 dB, respectively; <i>P</i> = .821). Steroid intervention within 14 days was predictive of an audiologic response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.33) and recovery (OR = 2.46; both <i>P</i> < .05) compared with patients who did not undergo steroid therapy, whereas delayed steroid intervention was not, regardless of steroid regimen. Severe hearing loss had worse odds of audiologic response (OR = 0.40) or recovery (OR = 0.10; both <i>P</i> < .05) compared with mild hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretreatment hearing deficit and initiation of empiric steroid therapy within 14 days were associated with audiologic prognosis, independent of the corticosteroid regimen. These findings reinforce the benefit of prompt steroid intervention, while further highlighting a need for standardized measures of audiometric outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate associations among pretreatment hearing deficit, corticosteroid intervention, and audiologic recovery among patients presenting with sudden sensorineural hearing loss within an integrated health system.

Methods: Electronic health records within a multicenter integrated health system were queried for clinical encounters with a diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in 2021. Patient demographics, audiometric data, and therapeutic steroid intervention were recorded. Audiologic response was defined as a decrease of 15 dB in 4-frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure tone average (PTA). Audiologic recovery, or complete response, was defined as a follow-up PTA (PTA2) of ≤ 25 dB or within 10 dB of 1) baseline or 2) contralateral ear. Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate for predictive factors.

Results: A total of 403 patients (mean age 59.27 ± 15.80 years, 57.32% male) met inclusion criteria, of which 355 underwent corticosteroid intervention. The nonsteroid group had a less severe hearing deficit (median PTA1 49.38 dB vs 58.75 dB with steroid group; P < .05). Median PTA improvement was 6.25 dB with steroid therapy and 3.63 dB without (P < .05), but median PTA2 between steroid and nonsteroid users was not significantly different (42.5 dB and 38.13 dB, respectively; P = .821). Steroid intervention within 14 days was predictive of an audiologic response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.33) and recovery (OR = 2.46; both P < .05) compared with patients who did not undergo steroid therapy, whereas delayed steroid intervention was not, regardless of steroid regimen. Severe hearing loss had worse odds of audiologic response (OR = 0.40) or recovery (OR = 0.10; both P < .05) compared with mild hearing loss.

Conclusion: Pretreatment hearing deficit and initiation of empiric steroid therapy within 14 days were associated with audiologic prognosis, independent of the corticosteroid regimen. These findings reinforce the benefit of prompt steroid intervention, while further highlighting a need for standardized measures of audiometric outcomes.

突发性感音神经性听力损失在皮质类固醇干预后听力学恢复的预后:跨多个结果测量的回顾性图表回顾。
目的:本研究旨在评估综合医疗系统中突发性感音神经性听力损失患者的预处理听力缺陷、皮质类固醇干预和听力学恢复之间的关系。方法:在多中心综合卫生系统中查询2021年诊断为突发性感音神经性听力损失的临床就诊的电子健康记录。记录患者人口统计学、听力数据和治疗性类固醇干预。听力学反应定义为4频(500、1000、2000、4000 Hz)纯音平均(PTA)下降15 dB。听力学恢复或完全缓解被定义为随访PTA (PTA2)≤25 dB或1)基线或2)对侧耳10 dB以内。采用Logistic回归对预测因素进行评估。结果:403例患者(平均年龄59.27±15.80岁,男性57.32%)符合纳入标准,其中355例患者接受了皮质激素干预。非类固醇组的听力损失较轻(PTA1中位数为49.38 dB,类固醇组为58.75 dB;P < 0.05)。类固醇治疗组PTA改善的中位数为6.25 dB,未治疗组为3.63 dB (P < 0.05),但类固醇治疗组和非类固醇治疗组的中位数PTA2差异无统计学意义(分别为42.5 dB和38.13 dB;P = .821)。14天内类固醇干预可预测听力学反应(优势比[OR] = 2.33)和恢复(OR = 2.46;(P < 0.05)与未接受类固醇治疗的患者相比,而延迟类固醇干预则没有,无论类固醇治疗方案如何。重度听力损失的听力学反应(OR = 0.40)或恢复(OR = 0.10;P < 0.05)。结论:预处理听力缺陷和14天内开始体检性类固醇治疗与听力学预后相关,与皮质类固醇治疗方案无关。这些发现强化了及时类固醇干预的益处,同时进一步强调了对听力学结果进行标准化测量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信