Effect of Augmented Renal Clearance and Febrile Neutropenia on Initial Trough Level and Clearance of Teicoplanin.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Nozomi Kondo, Ryota Tanaka, Ryosuke Tatsuta, Haruka Tsushita, Takehiro Hashimoto, Kazufumi Hiramatsu, Hiroki Itoh
{"title":"Effect of Augmented Renal Clearance and Febrile Neutropenia on Initial Trough Level and Clearance of Teicoplanin.","authors":"Nozomi Kondo, Ryota Tanaka, Ryosuke Tatsuta, Haruka Tsushita, Takehiro Hashimoto, Kazufumi Hiramatsu, Hiroki Itoh","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Augmented renal clearance (ARC) and febrile neutropenia (FN) increase drug clearance primarily through glomerular filtration. In this study, we evaluated the influence of ARC and FN on dose-normalized trough concentration (C/D) and/or clearance of teicoplanin (TEIC) by comparing C/D between patients with ARC and non-ARC, and C/D and clearance between patients with FN and non-FN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study enrolled 309 patients who received intravenous injections of TEIC between July 2016 and September 2021. Of the 94 patients who met the selection criteria, 25 satisfied the ARC definition, and 31 satisfied the FN definition. Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula, ARC was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 96.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 or higher. FN was defined as an axillary temperature 37.5°C or higher and neutrophil count of less than 500/μL. TEIC clearance was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model for adult Japanese patients with Bayesian estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the non-ARC group (n = 69), the ARC group (n = 25) had a significantly lower first trough concentration (P = 0.014) and lower C/D (P = 0.009). By contrast, the FN (n = 31) and non-FN (n = 63) groups did not differ significantly in the first trough concentration, C/D, or clearance (P = 0.294, 0.945, and 0.337, respectively). Forced-entry multiple regression analysis identified ARC as the only independent factor associated with C/D (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher TEIC loading dose may be required for patients with ARC, regardless of the presence or absence of FN.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) and febrile neutropenia (FN) increase drug clearance primarily through glomerular filtration. In this study, we evaluated the influence of ARC and FN on dose-normalized trough concentration (C/D) and/or clearance of teicoplanin (TEIC) by comparing C/D between patients with ARC and non-ARC, and C/D and clearance between patients with FN and non-FN.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study enrolled 309 patients who received intravenous injections of TEIC between July 2016 and September 2021. Of the 94 patients who met the selection criteria, 25 satisfied the ARC definition, and 31 satisfied the FN definition. Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula, ARC was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 96.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 or higher. FN was defined as an axillary temperature 37.5°C or higher and neutrophil count of less than 500/μL. TEIC clearance was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model for adult Japanese patients with Bayesian estimation.

Results: Compared with the non-ARC group (n = 69), the ARC group (n = 25) had a significantly lower first trough concentration (P = 0.014) and lower C/D (P = 0.009). By contrast, the FN (n = 31) and non-FN (n = 63) groups did not differ significantly in the first trough concentration, C/D, or clearance (P = 0.294, 0.945, and 0.337, respectively). Forced-entry multiple regression analysis identified ARC as the only independent factor associated with C/D (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: A higher TEIC loading dose may be required for patients with ARC, regardless of the presence or absence of FN.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信