Comparison of intrauterine transfusion techniques in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
R M van 't Oever, V M van Duijn, F Slaghekke, M C Haak, D P de Winter, E Lopriore, M de Haas, S Le Cessie, E J T Verweij
{"title":"Comparison of intrauterine transfusion techniques in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.","authors":"R M van 't Oever, V M van Duijn, F Slaghekke, M C Haak, D P de Winter, E Lopriore, M de Haas, S Le Cessie, E J T Verweij","doi":"10.1002/uog.29201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) are the cornerstone in treatment for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). It has been suggested that a non-vascular intraperitoneal blood transfusion used in conjunction with an intravascular IUT can slow the decrease in fetal hemoglobin (Hb) levels, potentially extending the interval between transfusions. Our aim was to evaluate the rate of decline in Hb levels and the interval between transfusions using different IUT techniques, including intrahepatic transfusions with and without intraperitoneal transfusion, and transplacental transfusion at the site of the placental cord insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Leiden University Medical Center, the national referral center for HDFN, between January 2006 and December 2022. All cases that underwent intrahepatic (with and without intraperitoneal transfusion) and placental cord insertion IUTs during the study period were included. The primary outcome was the decline in Hb levels per week, measured by comparing the Hb level immediately after the IUT with the Hb level before the subsequent IUT or birth. The primary outcome was analyzed using generalized estimating equations with and without adjustment for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 309 fetuses that received a total of 791 IUTs, of which 151 were intrahepatic-only transfusions, 273 were intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusions and 367 were placental cord insertion transfusions. We found an adjusted mean difference in the decline in Hb levels of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.29-0.66) g/dL/week between the group that underwent intrahepatic-only transfusion and the group that underwent intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion (P < 0.001). The adjusted mean difference between the intrahepatic-only IUT group and the placental cord insertion IUT group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.05-0.94) g/dL/week (P = 0.030). The median interval to the next IUT for the total cohort was 21 (interquartile range (IQR), 18-28) days. Similarly, in the intrahepatic-only and placental cord insertion IUT groups, the median interval to the next IUT was 21 (IQR, 19-28) and 21 (IQR, 15-26) days, respectively. In the intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion group, the median interval was slightly higher (26 (IQR, 21-28) days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decline in Hb levels was slower when using intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion compared with other IUT techniques and seemed to prolong the interval between IUT procedures. The potential clinical advantages of the intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion technique need to be weighed against the increased complexity and extended duration of the procedure on an individual basis. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) are the cornerstone in treatment for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). It has been suggested that a non-vascular intraperitoneal blood transfusion used in conjunction with an intravascular IUT can slow the decrease in fetal hemoglobin (Hb) levels, potentially extending the interval between transfusions. Our aim was to evaluate the rate of decline in Hb levels and the interval between transfusions using different IUT techniques, including intrahepatic transfusions with and without intraperitoneal transfusion, and transplacental transfusion at the site of the placental cord insertion.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Leiden University Medical Center, the national referral center for HDFN, between January 2006 and December 2022. All cases that underwent intrahepatic (with and without intraperitoneal transfusion) and placental cord insertion IUTs during the study period were included. The primary outcome was the decline in Hb levels per week, measured by comparing the Hb level immediately after the IUT with the Hb level before the subsequent IUT or birth. The primary outcome was analyzed using generalized estimating equations with and without adjustment for confounders.

Results: We included 309 fetuses that received a total of 791 IUTs, of which 151 were intrahepatic-only transfusions, 273 were intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusions and 367 were placental cord insertion transfusions. We found an adjusted mean difference in the decline in Hb levels of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.29-0.66) g/dL/week between the group that underwent intrahepatic-only transfusion and the group that underwent intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion (P < 0.001). The adjusted mean difference between the intrahepatic-only IUT group and the placental cord insertion IUT group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.05-0.94) g/dL/week (P = 0.030). The median interval to the next IUT for the total cohort was 21 (interquartile range (IQR), 18-28) days. Similarly, in the intrahepatic-only and placental cord insertion IUT groups, the median interval to the next IUT was 21 (IQR, 19-28) and 21 (IQR, 15-26) days, respectively. In the intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion group, the median interval was slightly higher (26 (IQR, 21-28) days).

Conclusion: Decline in Hb levels was slower when using intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion compared with other IUT techniques and seemed to prolong the interval between IUT procedures. The potential clinical advantages of the intrahepatic + intraperitoneal transfusion technique need to be weighed against the increased complexity and extended duration of the procedure on an individual basis. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病宫内输血技术的比较。
目的:宫内输注(IUTs)是治疗胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病(hddn)的基石。有研究表明,非血管性腹腔内输血与血管内IUT联合使用可以减缓胎儿血红蛋白(Hb)水平的下降,可能延长两次输血的间隔。我们的目的是评估Hb水平下降的速度和使用不同IUT技术的输注间隔,包括肝内输注和不输注腹腔内输注,以及在胎盘脐带插入部位输注胎盘。方法:2006年1月至2022年12月,我们在莱顿大学医学中心(hdf的国家转诊中心)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。所有在研究期间接受肝内(有或没有腹腔内输血)和胎盘脐带插入IUTs的病例均被纳入研究。主要结果是每周Hb水平的下降,通过比较IUT后立即的Hb水平与随后IUT或出生前的Hb水平来测量。主要结果分析使用广义估计方程有或没有调整混杂因素。结果:我们纳入309例接受791次IUTs的胎儿,其中151例为单肝内输注,273例为肝内+腹腔输注,367例为胎盘脐带插入输注。我们发现,仅肝内输注组和肝内+腹腔输注组Hb水平下降的调整后平均差异为0.48 (95% CI, 0.29-0.66) g/dL/周(P结论:与其他IUT技术相比,肝内+腹腔输注组Hb水平下降较慢,似乎延长了IUT手术之间的间隔时间。肝内+腹腔内输血技术的潜在临床优势需要在个体基础上与增加的复杂性和延长的手术时间进行权衡。©2025作者。妇产科学超声由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科学超声学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信