The Efficacy of Fluvoxamine in Anxiety Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by synthesizing evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, focusing on fluvoxamine's efficacy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), panic disorder (PD), and OCD. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fluvoxamine to a placebo or other drugs. The quality of evidence from the included reviews was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-version 2 (AMSTAR-2). Results: The study included fourteen systematic reviews (five for OCD, three for SAD, and six for PD), covering thirty-seven RCTs (sixteen for OCD, six for SAD, and fifteen for PD), with a total of 3621 patients (1745 with OCD, 1034 with SAD, and 842 with PD). A high-quality systematic review demonstrated that fluvoxamine is superior to a placebo in improving symptoms and the response rates for OCD. Three meta-analyses comparing fluvoxamine to clomipramine in OCD found no significant differences in efficacy regarding symptom improvement. Two additional systematic reviews, both rated as high quality, confirmed the superiority of fluvoxamine in reducing symptom severity and improving the response rates in patients with SAD compared to a placebo. However, the findings for PD were inconsistent. A meta-analysis, also rated as high quality, found that while fluvoxamine showed better response rates than a placebo, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall, the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of OCD and SAD was demonstrated. While some reviews highlighted its potential in alleviating GAD, its impact on panic-specific outcomes remained inconsistent.