Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/ph18030354
Ana Ascaso-Del-Rio, Paola Camargo-Mamani, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Mónica Díez-Hochleitner, Leonor Laredo-Velasco, Teresa Iglesias-Hernangómez, María Rosario Salas-Butrón, Laura Galán Caballero, Iván Alejandro Díaz-Rengifo, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Emilio Vargas-Castrillón, Antonio Portolés-Pérez
{"title":"Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ana Ascaso-Del-Rio, Paola Camargo-Mamani, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Mónica Díez-Hochleitner, Leonor Laredo-Velasco, Teresa Iglesias-Hernangómez, María Rosario Salas-Butrón, Laura Galán Caballero, Iván Alejandro Díaz-Rengifo, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Emilio Vargas-Castrillón, Antonio Portolés-Pérez","doi":"10.3390/ph18030354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. <b>Results:</b> The arithmetic mean C<sub>max</sub> was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(C<sub>max</sub>) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin® 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. Methods: This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. Results: The arithmetic mean Cmax was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC0-t was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(Cmax) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC0-t). Conclusion: Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin® 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信