The effects of endoscopic vacuum therapy for non-operative treatment of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Catherine Kollmann, Beata Kusnezov, Lars Kollmann, Jasmin Schmitt, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Johan F Lock, Sven Flemming
{"title":"The effects of endoscopic vacuum therapy for non-operative treatment of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients.","authors":"Catherine Kollmann, Beata Kusnezov, Lars Kollmann, Jasmin Schmitt, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Johan F Lock, Sven Flemming","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03672-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rectal resection has remained the cornerstone in curative treatment of rectal cancer. This however, implies the risk of anastomotic leakage leading to morbidity, mortality and potentially disease progression. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a promising tool in leakage therapy in order to avoid reoperation and Hartman resection. However, its clinical efficacy and its potential effect on oncological outcomes still requires further research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, we analysed all consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for rectal cancer during 2012-2021. The incidence and management of anastomotic leakage and its effects on long-term oncological outcomes were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 334 patients underwent rectal resection of whom 47 patients (14.1%) developed postoperative anastomotic leakage. Non-operative leakage treatment (NOLT) was successful in in 76.9% of which EVT was the most efficient (90.0% success) while reoperation was successful in 52.4% (p = 0.073). The more frequent application of EVT increased the NOLT rate from 48.3 to 66.7% during the observation period (p = 0.176). Concerning long-term outcomes, no differences in disease-free survival (p = 0.657) nor patient survival (p = 0.295) could be determined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVT is an effective treatment option for anastomotic leakage after rectal resection. EVT enables NOLT in the majority of cases. However, there might be no impact on oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03672-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Rectal resection has remained the cornerstone in curative treatment of rectal cancer. This however, implies the risk of anastomotic leakage leading to morbidity, mortality and potentially disease progression. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a promising tool in leakage therapy in order to avoid reoperation and Hartman resection. However, its clinical efficacy and its potential effect on oncological outcomes still requires further research.

Methods: In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, we analysed all consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for rectal cancer during 2012-2021. The incidence and management of anastomotic leakage and its effects on long-term oncological outcomes were analysed.

Results: A total of 334 patients underwent rectal resection of whom 47 patients (14.1%) developed postoperative anastomotic leakage. Non-operative leakage treatment (NOLT) was successful in in 76.9% of which EVT was the most efficient (90.0% success) while reoperation was successful in 52.4% (p = 0.073). The more frequent application of EVT increased the NOLT rate from 48.3 to 66.7% during the observation period (p = 0.176). Concerning long-term outcomes, no differences in disease-free survival (p = 0.657) nor patient survival (p = 0.295) could be determined.

Conclusion: EVT is an effective treatment option for anastomotic leakage after rectal resection. EVT enables NOLT in the majority of cases. However, there might be no impact on oncological outcomes.

内镜下真空治疗吻合口瘘非手术治疗对直肠癌患者肿瘤预后的影响。
目的:直肠切除术一直是直肠癌根治性治疗的基石。然而,这意味着吻合口漏的风险导致发病率、死亡率和潜在的疾病进展。为了避免再次手术和Hartman切除术,内镜下真空治疗(EVT)已成为一种很有前途的渗漏治疗工具。但其临床疗效及对肿瘤预后的潜在影响仍需进一步研究。方法:在这项回顾性单中心队列研究中,我们分析了2012-2021年期间所有连续接受直肠癌直肠切除术的患者。分析吻合口瘘的发生率、处理方法及其对远期肿瘤预后的影响。结果:334例患者行直肠切除术,术后吻合口瘘47例(14.1%)。非手术外漏治疗(NOLT)成功率为76.9%,其中EVT成功率最高(90.0%),再手术成功率为52.4% (p = 0.073)。EVT应用频率越高,观察期内NOLT率由48.3%提高至66.7% (p = 0.176)。关于长期结局,无病生存期(p = 0.657)和患者生存期(p = 0.295)均无差异。结论:EVT是直肠切除术后吻合口瘘的有效治疗方法。EVT在大多数情况下启用NOLT。然而,这可能对肿瘤预后没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信